Gransnet forums

Chat

May i ask a question?

(112 Posts)
poppy1 Sun 15-Sept-13 15:08:32

The thread ref "caothangers and pain has been removed,
I dont understand why!

It wasnt meant to be offensive or in any ill taste yet ive just tried to read any replies and find Aka had replied last and yet the complete thread has been taken off?

May i ask why? If we dont know whats been done thats so wrong how do we know not to repeat the same wrong doings again?
At 64 years of age i certainly dont want to upset or offend anybody 'but feel to be told why would be a help.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:01:20

Bang on, vamp.

Greatnan Sun 15-Sept-13 18:03:53

If Pakistani people find the term offensive, then it is. It is used in a derogatory way by racist thugs. I don't know where Poppy1 has been for the last twenty years, possibly in France, but it is certainly not an acceptable term in England (or on this forum).
I chose an Irish name by deed poll and I am quite happy to laugh at Irish jokes but I have not been subjected to racist abuse.
I am glad African Americans are proud to be black - how different from some Asian races where people pay small fortunes to get their skin whitened. Some adverts for spouses specify that they must be pale skinned.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:04:13

bluebell, actually sometimes it's true – the taking of offence being the taker's problem rather than the other person's, especially if it is obvious from context that offence is not intended. I think is possible to be too sensitive to flippant or careless remarks.

My dad always told us: "It is a greater sin to take offence where none is intended than to give offence." I think he was right.

Greatnan Sun 15-Sept-13 18:05:59

Bluebell - our posts crossed.

bluebell Sun 15-Sept-13 18:07:52

Bags - completely disagree - that excuses thoughtless people from taking responsibility for their own crassness

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:08:20

I've said before that the Pakistani family that ran a shop where I lived in Oxfordshire called it "The Paki Shop" so clearly not all people of Pakistani origin find the abbreviation offensive.

bluebell Sun 15-Sept-13 18:09:33

Bags - it's also the excuse that people use - I didn't mean, I'm not a racist/ sexist etc, can't you take a joke etc etc

bluebell Sun 15-Sept-13 18:10:39

Bags - it's to wrong foot the person you have just offended and make them look in the wrong

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:10:58

I'm not talking about actual crassness, bluebell, just unclear areas, e.g. where the same word or phrase is used in different ways in different areas so is open to 'misuse' in some contexts but not others.

Also, if someone genuinely is crass, you can tell them so without being offended. I do.

bluebell Sun 15-Sept-13 18:11:17

But Bags many do so it's best avoided

Greatnan Sun 15-Sept-13 18:11:44

It doesn't have to be all Pakistani people who find it offensive- it seems to me that the family who ran that shop may have been trying to draw the sting out of the word.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:11:58

I think perhaps we are not quite talking about the same thing, bluebell.

I would never deliberately offend someone but that's not to say someone might not take offence at something I say.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:12:53

Either take the sting out or acknowledge that they felt no sting.

bluebell Sun 15-Sept-13 18:12:58

Bags - you're finessing now when I think Moved's comments had no such component

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:14:13

The problem is that what is offensive and what isn't is a minefield and it's very easy to "go wrong" without ever meaning to.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:15:04

I do finesse about meaning. I think it matters.

Greatnan Sun 15-Sept-13 18:17:04

I think the majority of Pakistani people would find the term offensive, and no finessing of language is going to persuade me otherwise.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:19:44

I agree, and that's why I don't use the term. But in general in my book if an expression isn't used offensively then it isn't offensive. Context matters.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:22:20

And, in general (I'm not talking about a particular case), I agree with the remark that sometimes it is the person taking offence who has the problem. It simply is true that some people are more offendable than others. That has nothing to do with racism either. It's a general observation with no skin colour or country of origin boundaries. That is all I was saying.

Greatnan Sun 15-Sept-13 18:23:20

I can't think of any circumstances in which the term would not be offensive, whatever the intention of the person using it.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:23:33

Nobody has to agree but I don't accept that that's an unreasonable thing to say.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:23:58

greatnan, I said I was not talking about the term "Paki"!

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:25:09

Sorry, I misunderstood. Crossing posts. But anyway, the people in the local shop I spoke about weren't offended when they used it themselves so circumstances do exist even if you can't think of any.

thatbags Sun 15-Sept-13 18:27:22

And besides all this there is the situation we were discussing earlier in which I objected to a term you used, for good reasons, but wasn't at all "offended" by it. I think the term "offended" is overused to be honest.

janeainsworth Sun 15-Sept-13 18:31:21

I'm afraid I can't follow the finer points of this discussion blush but I can support Bags assertion that sometimes Pakistani people refer to themselves by the unmentionable term.
There was a shop across the road from my practice owned by a large Pakistani family, and certainly the younger male family members used it, perhaps with a touch of irony but always in a good-humoured way.