This means a "no unnecessary presents pact", according to the Money Saving Expert newsletter, and I think that there is often a good case for it.
Yesterday evening I had to listen to a friend complaining about how hard it is for her to find presents for her grown up sisters, especially sister XXX, whose name is always followed by the phrase "the one who's a barrister" (always makes me think of Hyacinth Bucket with her sister Violet, the one with a Mercedes and room for a pony).
We have this conversation every year, and every year I suggest that they all agree to stop it, or at least keep it to a token present with a pre-agreed limit. This conversation has been going on annually for at least the last 10 years that I can remember, and my friend and her husband are on a pretty tight income.
She then said how she had no idea what to get her children, who both live away (although very nearby) and are aged 25 and 23. She had got them a couple of silly little bits, but was then stuck. I suggested she ask them to make a list of 4 or 5 things, then choose something from that, so it would still be a surprise but at least would be something they wanted. She did say that she might get her daughters favourite perfume (which is not a cheap one) but then stagggered me by saying "I could get them each a jacket or a coat because at least it's something big to unwrap"
Is it me? I truly don't get it!
I do remember the feeling of doom as my mother would arrive on Christmas Day with bulging sacks, where she had bought things for the boys but then got more and more things "for the pleasure of seeing them unwrap lots of presents" but it was me that was left with trying to find space to store all the extra stuff that would rarely be played with.
I'm truly not a "bah humbug" person, but I struggle to understand my friends attitude.
What are your thoughts?