Bellsisabelle

Ana your last paragraph at 21.38
I've no idea who that might be.
I also didn't recognise Belleisabelle as being whom others think she was.
I'll join you on the back seat N&G

I was wondering also merlotgran
I'm sure all ok
Just wait and then quite soon name willl Ring a Bell

Harmless thread? It states "we all know what that means" giving the impression that there are hidden things going on. Or are they not hidden if "we all know".

Anyway, I have no idea what's going on but just thought I'd join in anyway since we're all friends here, right?

Such pickiness, such unpleasantness...
such bitterness.

Totally unaware of bellsisabelle's appearance/reappearance/disappearance but gobsmacked that an apparently harmless thread could turn so nasty so quickly!
What on earth prompted that sudden rush to bitch??

I think perhaps instead of pointing fingers and be moaning the mystery mean ones it might be prudent to get the facts first .

After all innocent until proven guilty - not guessed, surmised , maybe etc .

I shall be donning my flak jacket and helmet if we're going down the route of blaming random people without fear or favour !

Blimey, missed that one. And I'm no good at cryptic clues. Billy no mates, that's me.

Anyway, it was a bit of a posh moniker. I was expecting something more like "tunaboobs".

Yes, I've been wondering why it's one rule for x and a different one for y.

I am not a daily poster on GN so I am probably not up to speed with all the comings /goings. I am amazed that some of you have the time /inclination to seek out specific posts on a variety of threads. Or maybe you all have super memories?

These posts are not 100% clear to me but I am assuming Belleisabelle has left GN, either by choice or not. I am also gleaning, from the cryptic comments, that she may have been the reincarnation of a previous poster. There is also a 'hint' that she must have been 'forced off'.
Did not see enough of her posts to register if she was a 'delicate flower' who was upset easily or a ' feisty' poster who got under people skin.
Too confusing for me!

Yes, that's possible Lona. It would seem they're more interested in 'rules is rules' rather than giving someone the benefit of the doubt.

Certainly bellisabelle had not posted anything contentious or offensive.

Meanwhile, another obvious reincarnation, having been banished twice before, is allowed to carry on posting.

As usual, I missed it! Story of my life!

I missed out on knowing who she was.... sometimes I feel like I'm at the back of bus

It was pretty obvious who she was, so maybe GNHQ just removed her.

To say I was quick to"pounce on this thread " is a bit OTT( jalima and ana beat me to it., I don't notice you having a go at them )
I noticed it, commented , what on earth is wrong or unusual in that?
For what it is worth -and I don't actually know why I am bothering to defend myself- I was NOT in any way responsible for * jingl's* barring, I did NOT report any of her reincarnations if there were any and I have NOT expressed any comments at all about bellsisabelle
I am beginning to feel more than a little persecuted and as I said, if you are seeking to apportion blame you are barking up the wrong tree.

Do we know for certain that Bellsisabelle has been pushed? Is there any chance that she just decided it wasn't fun any more?......unlikely I know but I would really hate to think that someone has put the boot in again

You were very quick indeed to pounce on this thread even though it all goes over your head.

When granjura returned from her holiday in South Africa, or wherever it was, you welcomed her back and said she'd been missed. Can't remember the thread.

You didn't waste much time sharpening the knives though.

That's my explanation. Short and sweet. No need for waffle.

OK what I was trying to say was simply this
Has a past member who was apparently banned by GNHQ returned with a new user name? (None of my business if so.)
But does "we all know what that means" and "some people are just so nasty" mean that she has been dobbed in by person or persons unknown and required to leave? Again.
Is that straightforward enough?
Remind me not to comment in future, it only ever gets me into trouble.
Now in exchange, would you be prepared to explain your post please?

Would you like to explain what a 'here we go again' situation is, Daphne?

Just so I don't get hold of the wrong end of any sticks.

BTW I had no idea granjura WAS back from her most recent flounce.

Excuse me was that addressed to me??
Based on exactlywhat*???
If you do mean me, I am afraid you are barking up the wrong tree.
I had no idea who bellsisabelle is or was and if you are calling me a liar so be it.
And what has granjura to do with anything??

[scratch my head emotion] is this thread in code

Is this a "Here we go again" situation?

There speaks the woman who welcomed granjura back with open arms, telling her how much she'd been missed then proceeded to put the boot in until gj left again.

Such fun, such larks.....such hypocrisy

No need to bother with this thread then...

Is this a "Here we go again" situation?
(Went over my head if so)