What's wrong with "very representativeness"? Surely an organisation (is GN an organisation?) that is representative of the country's population in which is mainly acts is a good reflection on it? You know, democracy and all that.
Not that I'm agreeing or disagreeing with the concept tegan has said she's worried about. I'm just puzzled as to why accurate representativeness, if it exists, should be a problem. My initial reaction would be that it's a healthy sign of the organisation's true reach.
I think it's worth remembering also that only a small proportion of GN members are also active posters on the chat forums. So that group (the chatters) may not be representative at all.
Last letters make new words - Series 3
Orchids and other lovely plants that don’t need a lot of attention
..
.
!

