And the military authorities closely connected with the red poppy certainly use the term "collateral damage"
-During the 1991 Gulf War, Coalition forces used the phrase 'collateral damage' to describe the killing of civilians in attacks on legitimate targets. According to Scottish linguist Deborah Cameron,[16] "the classic Orwellian argument for finding this usage objectionable would be that it is jargon, and to the extent that people cannot decode it, it conceals what is actually going on;-
-it is a euphemism; abstract, agentless and affectless, so that even if people succeed in associating it with a real act or event they will be insulated from any feeling of repulsion and moral outrage".-