I never have understood the point of Vogue. Page upon page of advertising and shots of some very ill looking females wearing outfits no one in the real world would pay for or wear.
VB will look upon this, front cover of Vogue as an achievement in the surreal world of that ilk.
It has been strapped down so that she looks as though she has no breasts. Why bother booking a woman for a photoshoot if they want a flat chest? They could just have put that dress garment on a boy.
What's happening around her chest area? It looks odd. I read once that she never smiles in public because she hates her own smile, so I feel a bit sorry for her and all the adverse publicity she gets.
Google throws up a link to a Vogue article on polyamory ("three is not a crowd"), which is mentioned, so it looks as thought it is a genuine cover. Is that what attracted you to it, rufus?
Hideous photo of VB, not awesome at all, her face looks ugly and bad-tempered, probably because that dress is so uncomfortable. Designed by someone who doesn't like women with normal figures.
Have a look! Awesome She obviously was on a working holiday during her visit to the Invictus Games with David. Her fee was probably more than I earned in my final year before retirement, but I expect it all went to good causes Btw; I don't usually read Vogue! Cheers i.ebayimg.com/images/g/lvkAAOSwJjNbz6yZ/s-l640.jpg