Gransnet forums

Chat

I feel sorry for Prince Harry

(1001 Posts)
Artdecogran Sun 12-Jan-20 12:00:22

After looking at all the news reports etc I have come to the conclusion that Harry is really stuck in the middle of his wife and the RF. Meghan married Harry very quickly, which can cause difficulties in ‘normal’ families, but with the emotionally constipated RF it was a disaster waiting to happen. If someone like Diana, who had experience of royalty couldn’t cope with the way of life or the hold the courtiers have over proceedings, how could a feisty American. Catherine has only managed it because she and William took a very long time to get her settled into the RF.
Moving to a new country, getting married, having a baby and trying to fit into the RF is a heavy burden, and then being bullied completely by the press is enough to make anyone crack. The daily mail is still dredging up anyone they can to slate Meghan and Harry.
Harry is trying to protect his wife, and according to recent reports, has tried to initiate changes but has been rebuffed at every stage. I would think that seeing the photos on the Queen’s desk didn’t show him or Meghan or their son was hurtful and an indication that they no longer counted. The further photos of the 4 reigning/next in line would surely have pushed home that point.
Harry has slumped down the line of succession, the same thing that happened to Andrew, Anne and Edward. But they had each other to share this change of status and that surely made matters easier.
I think Harry feels very alone and impotent and is trying very hard to change things for his wife, but has had to make a huge fuss to get anyone to listen. If you add in his own personal problems then I am very surprised that he is still trying to go forward instead of just giving up. Perhaps now the RF will abandon their stiff upper lip and treat Harry better than they did Diana.
Sorry for long waffle.

Calendargirl Sat 18-Jan-20 08:09:30

Plenty of royals have lower key weddings, Zara Phillips, Peter Phillips, both grandchildren of the Queen. And Princess Anne’s own, albeit second wedding, very small, private, wearing a not new outfit, no, Harry and Meghan could have chosen a more discreet do if that’s what they would have preferred.

Jane10 Sat 18-Jan-20 07:07:36

Er she invites the press in. That's the difference.

vegansrock Sat 18-Jan-20 06:28:16

Poor woman can’t do anything without being criticised. She has a lovely smile - no she’s “grinning like a Cheshire Cat” would you say that of St Catherine when she smiles? No I bet she’s the “perfect English rose”. If she chooses to do anything privately that’s criticised for not letting the public gawp. If she’s chooses to let Photographers in at an event that’s “courting publicity” .She can’t do right for doing wrong. No wonder she wants to get away from the toxic UK. And no one can claim to know how she feels or what her motivations and experiences are- only she knows that. No doubt if she gives an interview or writes a book she will get hauled over the coals for that. If she tries to do things privately and the press hound her she will be accused of wanting to be in the limelight.

SueH49 Sat 18-Jan-20 00:58:04

Vegansrock said If St Catherine visits a charity and there’s loads of pictures - is it because she “craves publicity”? Double standards abound when it comes to this couple.

It's not double standards when someone says they don't want to be under press scrutiny in the country that by nature of their heritage or their jobs is to be expected but then are quite happy to be so in another on their own terms.

That to me is double standards.

maddyone Sat 18-Jan-20 00:11:45

I think you’re right annsixty, because Meghan is in the news most days. If that’s a quiet life away from the media, whatever would a public life with the media be like? Meghan courts publicly, why on earth would she be out every day, grinning like a Cheshire cat? Surely she would be living quietly in the luxurious mansion she’s living in at the moment, and keeping a very low profile.
It has now occurred to me why she wanted all those tinsel town celebrities at her wedding, it was so she’d be known by them in preparation for what was to come.

annsixty Fri 17-Jan-20 23:35:25

No we don't and we never will.
I just wish they would get on with the private life they wish to live and then we could end all the speculation and forget them.
It is never going to happen sadly.

morethan2 Fri 17-Jan-20 22:42:22

It’s all speculation isn’t it? None of us truly knows for sure. Perhaps it’s Harry’s choice to step away, perhaps all the negative press of his wife does remind him of how it affected his mother and he’s scared history may repeat itself. We will never know for sure.

Ellianne Fri 17-Jan-20 21:33:08

If they had wanted a quiet wedding why then did they have to invite every celebrity they could think of? A less showy intimate family wedding would have included members of MM's family and of course she didn't want that.

maddyone Fri 17-Jan-20 21:05:25

How on earth do you know that their choice was a quiet wedding Luckygirl?
It’s hilarious that you know that, whilst others are continually being told that they don’t know anything about the whole sorry saga gringringrin

SirChenjin Fri 17-Jan-20 20:52:35

Yes, they do have an incredible amount of wealth - and do not need to work towards being financially independent, they are already there.

Their fame doesn’t need to be carried around with them - they could live very quiet lives if they chose to do so, but neither wants to. Their global brand and international charitable trust shows neither has a desire to step out of the limelight.

merlotgran Fri 17-Jan-20 20:52:13

As I understand it their choice was a quiet wedding, but their position forced them into a big do.

Where on earth did you get that idea from, Luckygirl?

Harry's 'good things' were all in the pre Meghan days. After that he just trailed behind her while she supported her chosen good causes.

Luckygirl Fri 17-Jan-20 20:47:11

As I understand it their choice was a quiet wedding, but their position forced them into a big do.

My life is not controlled and scrutinised, picked over and lied about. I think if it was I would find somewhere to get away from it all.

Their wealth, as I have said before, comes from her hard graft, and for him as an accident of birth.

There is no way that they cannot carry their fame around with them, so whatever way they choose to earn their livings (although they do not need to) that is inevitably going to be a part of it.

I do not feel in the least deceived. But then I do not look up to the RF as some sort of icon - they are just fellow human beings with virtues/failings and their own furrow to plough. For me there is no pedestal from which they can fall.

I think that Harry has used his unchosen position to do some good things and that Meghan has been beside him in this - good for them!

SirChenjin Fri 17-Jan-20 20:46:10

I think the only thing that was expected of the wedding was that they would actually feed the public they’d oh so graciously invited “to feel part of the celebrations”

maddyone Fri 17-Jan-20 20:44:33

No one, the people nor anyone else, demanded a massive wedding, but Harry probably expected it and wanted it. If he hadn’t wanted it he would have refused and had a quieter wedding, which is perfectly possible, even for royalty. Meghan could have said no thanks to the big wedding, it’s my second time around, I’ll have something a bit quieter. No hiding then at the time of the wedding. They looked happy and everyone was happy for them, hence the cheering crowds all along the carriage ride route. But then the British people are toxic, racist, and never ask her how she is. What a lot of rubbish. Meghan did deceive the British people and the royal family. Tickingbird is right. Meghan gave the royals and everyone else the impression that she was happy to marry Harry and take on everything associated with that. Twenty months later she’s gone, taking the baby with her. The sheer waste of money from the wedding, the house, the clothes, and everything else, and yet there are people on this thread who are defending this behaviour. Unbelievable.

MerylStreep Fri 17-Jan-20 20:32:04

Luckygirl
Deceive. promotes a belief, a concept or idea that is not true. It is often done for personal gain or advantage

Why was the 'Sussex' website set up in such secrecy? Who takes their dogs on a 4,700 journey just for a 6 week holiday?
Who lets the man they love face the music on their own?

merlotgran Fri 17-Jan-20 20:25:38

I think you were right with expected, trisher. It would have seemed unfair for Harry not to have almost as big a 'do' as his brother. I don't remember anyone demanding it.

I'm not up in arms because of the wedding. I was happy for them and thought Meghan was a welcome change.

My doubts and change of mind began with all the nonsense surrounding the (non) announcement of Archie's birth and the photos of body parts on Instagram. hmm

trisher Fri 17-Jan-20 20:17:05

I wasn't deceived I always felt the wedding was a load of hogwash, but it was what the people expected demanded. Now you are all up in arms because she gave you what you wanted.

SirChenjin Fri 17-Jan-20 20:15:29

Exactly tickingbird

tickingbird Fri 17-Jan-20 20:13:50

By accepting a state wedding costing millions, accepting an aristocratic title and all that goes with it and then setting up a trademarked brand with the intention of making huge amounts of money off the back of said title, and then..........deciding nah! Don’t want to do all this stuffy, boring royal stuff. I’ll keep the title and the kudos that go with it and clear off abroad to rake in the millions and hobnob with my celeb pals who only want to know me because I’m a Duchess. That luckygirl us how we’ve been deceived.

Luckygirl Fri 17-Jan-20 19:58:53

In what way have the British people been deceived?

Luckygirl Fri 17-Jan-20 19:58:01

She tried to de3ceive "us"!!! mind-boggling!

maddyone Fri 17-Jan-20 19:47:10

Luckygirl.

US is collective, us/we the British people

eazybee Fri 17-Jan-20 19:42:37

Prince Andrew most certainly did not abandon his wife, and he is not a convicted paedophile.
Dangerous ground.

Luckygirl Fri 17-Jan-20 19:31:59

*Cathrine never lied or tried to deceive us.
Megan tried ( and failed) to deceive us.* - unbelievable!

"US" - she has never been anywhere near me! Don't know the lass.

SirChenjin Fri 17-Jan-20 19:23:37

That to Hetty58 - I'm glad he's found a way to escape the worst of it, that's all

This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion