PMs message

Great post Emilymarie.

Haha Smileless I think ‘tis you who has the bonus point and not Maizie ?

I'm not sure Gabriella but I'm pretty certain Eve said it to the serpent.

Didn't Nero say that to Caeser or did David say that to a lion? ??

.....and before that Winston Churchill said that to somebody,
And before that Queen Victoria said it of somebody else.?
How far back shall we go with this?

If you are worried about yourselves, or your youngsters, going back to work in a situation where COVID prevention preparations have not been made e.g. proper PPE, plastic barriers, enough hand sanitation and much, much more, advise them to join a union asasp. The union can take the flack, if they need to complain. If they make the complaint themselves, they run the risk of being sacked. Yes, this has happened.

I make that one all, Jabberwok.
But Eddie Mair got it in first... March 2013. So a bonus point to me..

That's as may be but Anna Sourbry certainly made the same comment to John McDonnell on the 16th Sept 2016 during Question Time.

Nanna58 I know and add to that the effort of trying to social distance them and not touch them!!!! I did Reception a couple of times in my career and coped (just) but it left me with everlasting respect for those who did it year in year out. And were brilliant at it.

In regard to those enquiring as to my style of writing in my posts on this forum, I can assure them that only I ever type or use voice recognition to make those posts.

In regard to using a formal style of writing that is without doubt because much of what I type or dictate in the course of my work has to be formal as those documents often go forward to company employee disciplinary or grievance hearings or the Industrial Courts (industrial tribunals).

The Legal Secretaries in the company always proofread all documents I and others compile before adding their own findings to such documents. They always write very formally and therefore I always TRY to emulate that so as not to give them to much work in editing my documents.

At home and for this forum, I do try to write less formally, but as some have noticed after spending at times all day writing in a formal manner I do not always succeed, or it comes out as a mixture of the two. ?

Anyway, coffee break over, back to the working grindstone.

If you don’t like someone commenting on things not directly said to them don’t post on a public forum GabriellaG. Oh dear, I seem to have done just what you so dislike....

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It is just as well that Starmer only had 6 minutes to question Johnson. As it was Johnson failed to reply to a single question posed to him from the wording in the 50 page document.

This is the prime minister for gods sake. We are all entitled to expect him to at the very least answer to the document he has apparently produced.

Interestingly the scientists have made it clear that they were not consulted before the various stages were decided on, so Johnson is being guided only by himself.

Whoops, I got the wrong post, GG54

It's the 09.33 one. Quite horrible and completely uncalled for. Not even your 'quarrel'...

No Jabberwok. It was said by Eddie Mair to Boris Johnson a few years ago. I expect I could find a video clip of it if you want confirmation.

It was said to Boris Johnson. I watched that. (The nasty piece of work remark)

MazieD MaizieD

MazieD
I think it was a good analogy. No nasty words in that post or allusions to anyone in particular, unlike yours to me.
It takes all sorts. You are just one.

Trisher, I loved your post! As a Reception teacher for many years, I used to watch with interest as those who opted for this year group( we were 3form entry) “ because it’s a doddle isn’t it? ) were virtually nervous wrecks well before the Spring term! ?

I think you'll find that was said by Anna Sourbury to John McDonnell on Question Time!

To those who can't seem to understand what Boris is telling us, surely to God you can understand the professional people standing either side of him, people he defers to and back up what he is saying in simple, baby language that my 10 year old grandson can understand?! Boris did say that as from today we can relax a little over outside exercise (the scientists backed him) next week certain of us can go back to work with provisos, cautiously and carefully. Rogue employers are to be reported. Use common sense, ask if you are unsure! What's so difficult not to understand? Incidentally our refuge collectors have been and are working through this pandemic, with two of them in the lorry as usual so presumably other people can also devise similar ways to work collectively and safely!

GG54

Your post at 09.40

In the well known words of a TV interviewer to Boris Johnson "You are a nasty piece of work, aren't you?"

I see that the guidelines now say no more than 15 children in a reception class - that's a bit of new information. Quite who is going to take the classes hasn't been decided I suppose, because of course reception class teachers can be anyone can't they? it's not a specialist area at all. It's all been so well thought out hasn't it?!!!

Please feel free to use the word ‘ one’ if you wish Gabriella G, no need to change your usual vernacular in order to converse with the rest of us! And I was merely commenting on, , not criticising, your idea that couples should think through cast iron contingency plans for childcare, including foreseeing a totally unprecedented pandemic, and if ( surprise,surprise!) they were unable to do so forego from having children!!!

I have just watched the ten o clock ITN News at Ten.
As clear as day it was said that workers who cannot work from home should return to work on Wednesday.

Aah, but, maddyone, the News at 10 on Monday evening ias not the speech that Johnson made on Sunday evening. About which you asserted, three times on this thread (and, apparently on another thread) that Johnson had said, in his speech, that people should go back to work from Wednesday.

Here you are saying it (just to refresh your memory) date and times. Well before the News at 10

Mon 11-May-20 11:32:24
I agree with you all. I didn’t find the speech confusing because it wasn’t confusing. If you can’t work from home you can go back to work from Wednesday. Not today. Wednesday.

Mon 11-May-20 11:46:25
Daisymae
Boris said yesterday to return to work on WEDNESDAY.
If you can’t work from home and if social distancing measures have been put in place.

Mon 11-May-20 12:18:28
I’ve been fighting this battle on two threads. I listened to the speech. BJ said people can return to work on Wednesday. I don’t understand why people are saying they can go to work today! They can’t because he said Wednesday,

Would you like me to also repost the transcript from Johnson's speech when he DOESN'T say it?

Of course, I realise that it's easy to get confused when you hear something that wasn't actually said... A bit 'meh' to patronise other people for doing it, though.