I did a bit of digging to make sure what I was posting is correct. There is no formal charge against Andrew and no formal accusation. Last year there was a request via MLAT for an interview which was turned down by Andrew's lawyers because the Dept of Prosecution that brought it had previously shot themselves in the foot by releasing dodgy information. No one's lawyer, whether you were royal or otherwise would allow cooperation under those circumstances. He has formally greed to 'help with their enquiries' 3 times, it's the US who can't get the legalities right.
The forced resignation from duties is no an admission of guilt, it's damage limitation because as stated ( by me) he is a monumental pillock.
Rumour has it Pizza Express may sue for defamation and loss of custom through alleged connection 
What is our role as older people?
What a difference a day makes 😢😢
Royal Mail threatens to stop deliveries over dog attacks
Craig and Lindsay Foreman end their hunger strike in prison in Iran.



