The only mention of 'thousands' I can find in the past few posts is in Grannydarkhair's post where she says:
there are approx 26,000 desisters/detransitioners on the appropriate sub-Reddit. I have no way of knowing how many are genuine, but believe women like Sinead Watson (a detransitioner) when she says there are thousands that are genuine.
Compare that with your arbitrary decision to 'let's say' that 10% of those having double mastectomies are trans and that 50% of those regret it, then come back and complain about inaccurate figures. GDH acknowledges that it is not possible to get genuine figures, but quotes from someone who has lived experience and is part of the detransitioning community - the figure of thousands comes from Sinead Watson, unless I have missed it on another, earlier post.
I have repeatedly taken issue with 'research' or with statements that claim to show figures for the percentage of trans people who are victimised, or who attempt suicide or whatever, but my questions, even when repeated are simply ignored. There are none, because there can't be.
It is not a question of 'just emoting' (although your dismissive way of describing concern about the misled and mistreated young people involved is very telling). It is a question of wondering why, all of a sudden, children are claiming to be 'in the wrong body', or to 'just know' that they belong to the opposite sex, and why this is linked to women losing safe spaces and the right to compete in sex-classes rather than so-called 'genders'. In anticipation of your response that transpeople have always been with us - yes, I am sure that this is the case, but it is not the case that they have been with us in anything like the numbers that they are now. The rise in numbers has coincided with the silencing of questioners, and with the conflation (in the TRA script) of a concern for victims like Sinead Watson and Kiera Bell with racism, homophobia and eugenics.
The creep of initiatives such as pronouns on email signatures and Teams/Zoom screens (whether or not you are personally familiar with the practices), the stated 'need' for dissenters to be 're-educated' so that they can 'reframe' their thought processes (even about their own traumas) has far more in common with dictatorships and authoritarianism than a questioning of self-appointed guardians of morality.
As for the idea that anyone who believes that women should not be locked in prison cells with male-bodied sex offenders thinks that transpeople should be left to kill themselves - that is idiotic, and yet another example of twisting what people are saying and putting words into their mouths. It is not a binary choice (and why that needs to be said is beyond me). The answer, quite clearly, is that more funding needs to be given to prisons, and that experts (psychologists, criminologists and the like) should be paid to come up with solutions that work for everyone. The solution won't be found by posters on a discussion board for older women, unless they too are experts in the field.
In the current political situation, however, that is unlikely to happen, but as a feminist I believe that this is not a reason to put women at risk in the meantime.