Gransnet forums

Chat

Actors who look nothing like the character they're playing

(130 Posts)
Beswitched Sun 20-Mar-22 11:50:09

I was watching an Agatha Christie last night. Two of the characters in the story looked absolutely nothing like the way they were described in the book.
They were quite the opposite in fact. The one who was meant to be stunningly beautiful was played by quite an ordinary looking actress, and the one who was meant to be very ordinary looking was played by a gorgeous looking young woman.

Does anyone else hate when this happens? It's always a bit disappointing I find.

Peaseblossom Mon 21-Mar-22 12:24:18

I totally agree. I hate that. In the film The Bone Collector they changed the sex of some of the characters and the ethnicity. I read the book which was excellent, and it was very annoying. Happens all the time. In TBC Lincoln Rhyme was changed to a black actor, Denzel Washington, and his assistant was changed from a young white guy to a black woman. The film wasn't a patch on the book, so many missing details. I find it awful if a black character is played by a white actor too.

Tom Cruise plays Jack Reacher, who is supposed to be 6ft 5in and he is about 5ft 7in! He has now been replaced with a taller actor.

EEJit Mon 21-Mar-22 12:13:46

There was only ever one Sherlock Holmes, Basil Rathbone; and Miss Marple was always Margaret Rutherford.

No one has ever matched these two.

Annaram1 Mon 21-Mar-22 12:10:48

Daniel Craig as 007? No way!

Witzend Mon 21-Mar-22 10:52:28

Chestnut

I have always preferred to see the film before reading the book, then you can't be disappointed. It works much better that way round.

I do agree, with the sole exception of Atonement, which I had read only about a month before seeing the film.
For once I had nothing to complain about at all!

Not a film, a TV series, but could say similar for The Way We Live Now (Anthony Trollope) which I had read more than once, where I thought David Suchet was absolutely superb as Melmotte, ditto Shirley Henderson as his badly treated daughter.

A highly recommended read/watch, for anyone unfamiliar.

Chestnut Mon 21-Mar-22 09:30:05

I have always preferred to see the film before reading the book, then you can't be disappointed. It works much better that way round.

annodomini Mon 21-Mar-22 09:25:10

If I didn't have this image of Michael Caine as Harry Palmer, I'd probably find Joe Cole perfectly cast. However, MC's deadpan delivery is inimitable! I wonder if adaptations of Len Deighton's other Harry Palmer books will be in the pipeline.

Sara1954 Mon 21-Mar-22 09:08:25

Calandargirl
I don’t think whoever did the casting can possibly have read the books.

Calendargirl Mon 21-Mar-22 09:05:14

Sara1954

My biggest moan is DCI Alan Banks in the Peter Robinson adaptations, also Annie.
Just can’t watch it, it’s too wrong.
I think the problem is, that it’s not just a book, it’s a lot of books read over a lot of years, and you have a very clear image of all the characters.

Totally agree. Alan Banks, in the book, was not very tall, dark, wiry, nice eyes. Stephen Tomkinson, probably incorrect spelling of name, was nothing like him, in either looks or personality. Too wishy washy, nervous, and sorry, just not attractive enough.

You could fancy the AB in the book, not on the screen. Yes, and ‘Annie’ wasn’t right either. And she didn’t die in the book!

Sara1954 Mon 21-Mar-22 08:39:40

My biggest moan is DCI Alan Banks in the Peter Robinson adaptations, also Annie.
Just can’t watch it, it’s too wrong.
I think the problem is, that it’s not just a book, it’s a lot of books read over a lot of years, and you have a very clear image of all the characters.

Witzend Mon 21-Mar-22 08:28:54

Casdon

Imagine being an author of the ilk of Jane Austen, and seeing the multiple adaptation of your works with actors and actresses completely different to what you had in mind. Gwyneth Paltrow as Emma for example - just no.

I infinitely prefer the version with Kate Beckinsale as Emma, Samantha Morton as Harriet, and Mark Strong as Mr Knightly.
Prunella Scales was also a wonderful Miss Bates.

IMO it knocks spots off the Paltrow version.

Agree also about Emma Thompson being all wrong in S and S.
For my money her sister Sophie is a better actress anyway. She played the endlessly complaining sister Mary wonderfully in the Amanda Root version of Persuasion, and has been equally brilliant in the completely different parts I’ve seen her play.

LullyDully Mon 21-Mar-22 08:27:50

My all time moan was the creepy Nicholas Cage as Captain Corelli.

PECS Mon 21-Mar-22 08:19:24

I am quite liking Joe Cole's Harry Palmer portrayal.

Calendargirl Mon 21-Mar-22 06:49:24

Beswitched

I think Emma Thompson in Sense and Sensibility was dreadful.

I quite liked Gwyneth Paltrow as Emma.

Did Emma Thompson write the screenplay though? Another example of getting yourself a plum role in the production.

Casdon Sun 20-Mar-22 21:59:20

Not for me Beswitched. Much too blonde, tall, simpery, and wishy-washy, she really got on my nerves. I suppose that’s the thing though, we all have different minds eyes. I imagine Emma much more like Kate Beckinsale.
I agree with you on Emma Thompson as Elinor Dashwood though, she was just too old I’m afraid.

Beswitched Sun 20-Mar-22 21:43:59

I think Emma Thompson in Sense and Sensibility was dreadful.

I quite liked Gwyneth Paltrow as Emma.

Casdon Sun 20-Mar-22 21:35:32

Imagine being an author of the ilk of Jane Austen, and seeing the multiple adaptation of your works with actors and actresses completely different to what you had in mind. Gwyneth Paltrow as Emma for example - just no.

Beswitched Sun 20-Mar-22 21:17:30

I wonder how authors feel when they see their creation being totally altered? I believe Agatha Christie wasn't at all happy about Margaret Rutherford playing Miss Marple

But, as another poster has said, she picked Joan Hickson out years before the BBC Miss Marple series as a future Jane Marple.

Blossoming Sun 20-Mar-22 21:11:54

PinkPrincess it was Jonathan Rhys Myers* and I agree, he played a magnificent brooding temperamental Henry.

Urmstongran Sun 20-Mar-22 21:09:19

A fair comment Grandma70.
We ought not to judge history by today’s standards I suppose.
?

MawtheMerrier Sun 20-Mar-22 20:55:29

It's called "acting".

mokryna Sun 20-Mar-22 20:54:00

I adored Richard Chamberlain in The Thorn Birds. I imagined him playing the part when I first read the book. I was so disappointed with Rachel Ward. I never imagined her actress to play opposite him. In my minds eye I didn’t think she was pretty enough

BBbevan Sun 20-Mar-22 20:52:57

Daniel Craig as the poet Ted Hughes in 'Sylvia'. Great acting but nothing like the man himself

Deedaa Sun 20-Mar-22 20:50:46

Glad I'm not the only one not impressed by the new All Creatures Great And Small. Sam West is good as Siegfried but the cast as a whole isn't a patch on the original. Poldark was another one. Robin Ellis was perfect as Ross Poldark and who could forget dear Ralph Bates as George Warleggan? All the minor characters in the new one seemed completely interchangeable and I never got the hang of who was who. Aidan is very gorgeous and was great as Rosetti, but never Ross.

netflixfan Sun 20-Mar-22 20:46:14

Agatha Raisin played by Ashley Jensen- not at all like the Agatha described by MC Beaton, a small stocky woman with a shiny brown bob, an small brown bear like eyes. However, Ashley is so good in the part I’ve almost forgotten!

pinkprincess Sun 20-Mar-22 20:39:53

I not remember the name of the actor who played Henry VIII in The Tudors but he dd not look one little bit like him.He was a marvellous actor and played the part very well.
Also the new version of All Creatures Great and Small was completely ruined for me by the complete change of actors.I know the original ones were no longer available but the new ones were not a patch on them.
Some of the actors in the soaps as well, e.g.Bethany in Coronation Street looks much older than the actor playing her mother, while Gail and Audrey look about the same age and they are supposed to be mother and daughter