rafichagran
Dickens You chose to ignore the fact I have been accused of colluding with Zouma I have never colluded with him, never kicked a cat, and I said I wanted him punished. Why are you choosing to ignore that.
You keep on about calling low life. Where did I directly say the poster was? You yourself in a post pointed out I did not directly.
I came back to defend myself about the collusion with Zouma, but I am now leaving the thread, but if I see anymore lies I will be reporting this.
Dickens I know this is a open forum, but the same person keeps coming back at me. All I am asking for is a apology for the accusation I am colluding with Zouma a man I do not know.
I believe I am right in what I stated but none of us will change our minds.
Again, no one is suggesting that you colluded with Zouma by abusing an animal yourself. That was not the accusation.
It's a bit more subtle. You've told us to "leave it to the Court" on the assumption - presumably - that they will hand down a suitable sentence, and that will be the end of it? It might - technically - well be the end of it, but for those of us (and they are many) who regard acts of deliberate cruelty to a sentient that cannot defend itself - be it animal, baby or small child - as an act of brutality, it will not easily be erased from the mind when the case is closed.
Colluding with an offense, or being complicit in it, doesn't mean that you would commit a similar crime yourself - it implies a certain level of tolerance. That's what people mean by 'colluding' - you, yourself, have said that he should be allowed to play football again, unhampered.
What would be a suitable punishment, in your eyes? A fine (which is probably what he will get)? a suspended sentence? Community service?
What do you think might make him reflect on what he's done? Personally, I think he needs to be made to examine his own behaviour - there's definitely a flaw in his character if, in a fit of temper, he can so easily resort to barbaric cruelty - in front of his children... and then allow the video to be posted on social media. That really is not stable behaviour, and he should not be allowed to just carry on as normal just because the Court has, technically, done its duty.
His talent has given him a privileged position - and he's abused it. And please don't bring race into this, his behaviour has nothing to do with his race, vicious bullies come from all quarters. And that's what he is, a vicious bully, like all the others of his kind.
Finally, the 'cut-and-thrust' on social media means that if you say 'snarky' things about someone, they might well retaliate. Before you demand an apology from others, I think maybe you should retract your "low-life" comment. That really was provocative, and it has made people examine your comments more closely than they would probably otherwise have done.