Hetty58 Fri 17-Jun-22 01:16:34
Spot on Enid101. Kids haven't changed much - and why the big fuss about peeing up a tree...
I agree that kids haven't changed much, but what has changed is parental attitudes / sense of responsibility and the whole dynamic of discipline in schools, the role of teachers etc.
I'm not about to write a thesis, but somewhere around the 60s 'society' relaxed its approach towards the young. They were encouraged (rightly) to 'express' themselves and we were similarly encouraged to view them as individuals in their own right. This (IMO) completely changed the dynamics. Some, for the better, and others not so much.
An incident highlighting this change has always remained in my mind. On the scale of 'things', it's trivial, but it was a significant example of that change. Sometimes, something seemingly trifling at the time can be the point at which you later realise was the juncture where it should have been taken more seriously because of the 'slippery slope' effect.
My son (aged 12) had his new jacket taken of its peg and thrown into a muddy puddle and then stamped on, at school (there were a group of boys at the school with a reputation for doing this kind of thing). OK, so the jacket was retrieved, washed, and a small tear repaired - no big deal. However, I did complain to a member of staff initially because my son couldn't locate his jacket, but was told by other pupils that it had been taken by 'the gang' and dumped somewhere. Her re-action was, to put it bluntly, mostly indifference... "have you looked in the lost-property box" she said, with a note of mild irritation.
That's the point at which I now believe that low-level anti-social behaviour was tolerated / accepted as inevitable. These were not 'deprived' kids, the school had a good reputation for academic achievement, and it was in a so-called 'desirable' area. And it's quite possible that the members of this 'gang' all grew up to be simply normal citizens.
Vandalism, for the sake of it, has always bothered me. Destroying something for no reason other than a desire to, well, destroy it is, to me, a worrisome trait. But it's now 'low-level crime', and we tolerate it because there are more serious issues at stake. And I was simply grateful that my son was never bullied or picked on by other pupils. A couple of park benches in a new playground here in my small town in The Cotswolds have been destroyed by a group of teenagers and newly-planted flowers dug up and strewn around. If you mention it on our local FB noticeboard, someone will inevitably tell you it's a 'first-world problem' (indeed, it most certainly is a problem in our 'first world') and that there are more worrying things to think about.
Trees are circular, there's a point at which you can often hide behind it to some extent to have a pee. But if you're of a certain mind-set, you won't bother because you won't care. And woe-betide anyone who does!