Great that the young man wasn’t doing anything political, and didn’t mean any harm, but do you think he ought to be paying something for the damage he caused in addition to the non-custodial sentence? -Or is this a license for anyone to damage things as long as it’s not political or meaning any harm.
How can *anybody* still see this man as any kind of statesman or world leader?
Will Labour backing rejoining be the “end” or the “making” of them??
