Gransnet forums

Chat

The case against ID cards

(343 Posts)
icanhandthemback Sat 05-Nov-22 22:43:40

I wouldn't mind one and I can see how they would be helpful. Watching a programme the other night about shop lifting, a woman who was obviously a professional shoplifter made up a load of rubbish about not having any ID, it not being her phone, it not being her boyfriend outside the door with her handbag, etc, etc. This happens quite often apparently so you can imagine the amount of time it takes the authorities to work out who you are is ridiculous. It's bad enough not having enough police about but if the ones that are working hard are having to go through this, it must be soul destroying and takes them away from detecting crime.
My main concern is that the Government would sell the details to insurance companies or other big business. If it could be enshrined in Law that they could not do this, I would be very comfortable with this. Germany, Italy,, and Spain all have them without people feeling they are living under Big Brother so I don't see why we can't.

Mollygo Sat 05-Nov-22 22:34:24

Until they come with a valid reason why I really need one, I’m not bothered.
As growstuff said, people already have so much information on us -more than I like, and I can’t do anything about it.
Being obliged to have one wouldn’t be a problem for me, any more than having passport or an identity lanyard for work bothers me. I don’t get why it worries people though.

Doodledog Sat 05-Nov-22 22:27:36

I am fairly ambivalent about them. I wouldn't want to live in a society where you could be stopped and asked to prove who you are 'just because', and I appreciate that having them at all could be the thin end of a wedge, but I wouldn't mind too much. I was a bit uneasy about Covid passports being linked to NHS records though. I really don't like the idea of anyone other than my doctor having access to health records, but that's a different question.

Mr Dog is absolutely, 100% against them. He doesn't have ID at all, as his driving licence is an old one, and his passport has expired, and he refuses to renew it unless and until he knows he is going to go abroad. I think it's ridiculous to have no proper form of ID, and TBH I don't think he realises how many things he might need it for, as it just hasn't come up. He isn't looking for work, he doesn't want a new bank account, and doesn't even buy bottles of booze as presents from Amazon grin. I have done all those things in the last 10 years, as well as going abroad, so can see the need for some form of ID. I have pointed out that if 'they' wanted to know anything about him they could find out easily enough, but he just says that that may be true but he's not going to make it easier for them. He'll need a new driving licence in a couple of years, as he'll be 70, so he'll have to have a photo one then, if we don't go abroad beforehand.

volver Sat 05-Nov-22 22:26:34

nanna8

Is it called a driver’s licence? That is what they want to see when they want photo I.D.here. Can’t see the diff really except those who don’t drive have to get a special ID thing which is a bit of a nuisance for them. Just one more card in your wallet along with health cards, library cards etc etc

When I lived in Oz I was once breathalysed as they were breathalysing everybody who drove along a particular urban street.

I was not happy, and told them so.

growstuff Sat 05-Nov-22 22:25:23

nann8 I usually use my driving licence too, when (for example) I want to pick something up from the post office. Unless you still have an old-fashioned paper licence, they have a photo and address, so are a good form of ID.

halfpint1 Sat 05-Nov-22 22:22:35

I have one to live in France. Been here over 30 years and I've never yet been asked by a Gendarme to produce it, it lives in a drawer in the house. I use my driving licence if needed at la poste. Not a problem as far as I'm concerned

nanna8 Sat 05-Nov-22 22:19:21

Is it called a driver’s licence? That is what they want to see when they want photo I.D.here. Can’t see the diff really except those who don’t drive have to get a special ID thing which is a bit of a nuisance for them. Just one more card in your wallet along with health cards, library cards etc etc

growstuff Sat 05-Nov-22 22:18:33

Barmeyoldbat

I wouldn’t want one either, they have enough information as it. It lays it open for being stopped and asked to show your your ID card for whatever reason by official. I have a passport and a driving licence that’s enough to prove its mr.

Why would having ID cards encourage the police to stop people randomly? They're not supposed to stop people without a reason, but if they do, they'll ask for ID (I assume - I've never been stopped). It's a change in the law which allowed random stops which would be dangerous, not having ID cards.

growstuff Sat 05-Nov-22 22:14:48

volver

growstuff

But why wouldn't people have an ID card? I still have my official National Insurance card in my wallet (issued automatically when I first started work) and recently used it when ID was required for something.

That's nice. But if you want to throw it away and not tell anyone, then that's allowed.

True, my point was that the government could issue an ID card automatically when people turn 16 just as they do (or did) NI cards.

growstuff Sat 05-Nov-22 22:12:54

volver

Yes I have all these things. Point is, I don't have to have any of them.

And nobody, police officer or not, gets to ask me who I am if I'm just walking down the street.

We give things up at our peril.

No, you don't have to have any of the cards, but the government and council still hold data about you.

Barmeyoldbat Sat 05-Nov-22 22:10:52

I wouldn’t want one either, they have enough information as it. It lays it open for being stopped and asked to show your your ID card for whatever reason by official. I have a passport and a driving licence that’s enough to prove its mr.

volver Sat 05-Nov-22 21:48:05

growstuff

But why wouldn't people have an ID card? I still have my official National Insurance card in my wallet (issued automatically when I first started work) and recently used it when ID was required for something.

That's nice. But if you want to throw it away and not tell anyone, then that's allowed.

volver Sat 05-Nov-22 21:46:19

Yes I have all these things. Point is, I don't have to have any of them.

And nobody, police officer or not, gets to ask me who I am if I'm just walking down the street.

We give things up at our peril.

growstuff Sat 05-Nov-22 21:42:59

But why wouldn't people have an ID card? I still have my official National Insurance card in my wallet (issued automatically when I first started work) and recently used it when ID was required for something.

growstuff Sat 05-Nov-22 21:40:32

Have you never used Government Gateway?

The government already holds loads of information about you, whether you like it or not.

It has your bank account details, if you're receiving a pension or benefits or have a government savings account (which I do). It knows your date of birth and you can be tracked very easily.

If you have a bus pass or a Railcard, your public transport journeys could be tracked. Your local council has details about how long you've lived at your address and who lives with you.

The way I see it, the horse has already bolted for people who want to keep their lives private. As for the police asking for ID, I'd be quite happy if there were enough police on the streets.

winterwhite Sat 05-Nov-22 21:38:04

As of course you know Volver the main purpose of ID cards is to enable the authorities to pounce on people who jdon’t have one.
It’s the smart card element that is so disconcerting - this govt is so incompetent with IT that there are bound to be endless glitches and hitches and the whole thing will judder to the ground. Meanwhile people will have been refused this and turned away from that quite unnecessarily.
Very worrying. Thanks for raising it.

rafichagran Sat 05-Nov-22 21:34:47

I would not like one either.

volver Sat 05-Nov-22 21:17:21

We wandered into ID cards on another thread so I thought I’d start a separate thread so we could discuss it without derailing the original thread. There is often talk about how it would make life easier because you’d have a way of proving who you are, where you live etc. All our entitlements etc could be linked to the card.

Does that not scare people?

The government, of whatever colour, would be able to track you and your actions. If they or the police think that you are doing/have done something they don’t like, they could demand to see your “papers”. I have never had to prove who I am just to “be” in this country, and I don’t see any need to start now.

I understand having to prove that you are who you say you are to drive a car, for instance, because that is a responsible activity and you have to prove you are up to it. But I don’t have to prove that I’m up to just walking about in this country, wherever I want to be.

So if anyone is going to say something like “it would help with voter fraud”, please explain how having a biometric card in your wallet, and all your data linked to it, would actually solve the problem. (That problem doesn’t exit, of course, but that’s a whole different thread.)

You might say that they know all this already, mobile phones, bank cards etc. But none of these things are compulsory. I could give them all up tomorrow and I’d be quite entitled to do that; nobody gets to know what I’m up to just for the sake of it. That would be surveillance, and we know how that ends up. smile