Calendargirl
Convalescent homes would be good, but no money to run them. Our largeish hospital, 20 miles away, was where you went for operations, but then transferred to our little cottage hospital to recuperate. This was of course many years ago.
So much better than nowadays, but cottage hospitals no longer exist round here. Also where elderly folk might spend their last days was often there, cared for by local doctors and nursing staff, made visiting for family and friends so much easier,
There is money to run them - if the government (any government) chooses to invest in public services. You may have noticed that this current one doesn't! Nor the one before it. Or the one before that one!
Cottage hospitals were ideal for patients who did not need critical care and were no longer acutely ill. They only needed minimum staffing levels and provided facilities for tailored exercise and rehabilitation back into the community, giving people - especially the more vulnerable elderly - the time, space and confidence to get back into the swing of things. Our local cottage hospital had a cafeteria run by volunteers and a small library with books and games donated by the local community.
Now you are pitchforked straight from your acute bed into your home with carers (when they can be found) giving you 15 minutes per call to attend to your needs. Purely anecdotal but according to a couple of hospital porters I've spoken to, there are quite a few (but how many?) patients who are re-admitted to hospital because they simply were not well enough to cope. It would be interesting to know factually just how much money has been 'saved' by doing away with these hospitals and replacing them with 'care in the community'.
Our local cottage hospital still exists but with a much reduced capacity - there are only 29 beds for a population of roughly 500,000 people.


