growstuff
MerylStreep
If the NHS had a decent/ up to date/ working IT system it would/ could be more efficient.
It certainly would, but (see above), the NHS doesn't exist as a single body.
My thoughts exactly. We've proved just on this thread that differences around the country mean we are not discussing "one" system currently in operation and there are huge differences as to delivery..
Locally I've been mostly very pleased with the way I've been referred and informed - a mixture of computer and letters. but that's because I have agreed to this form of communication. Test results sent directly to me including outcomes at the same time as GP gets it - details of follow up in same letter - text reminders for all appointments
- generally only letters when there are forms to be filled in with the letter or special instructions like dont eat, only bring in x and y, contact z if you need to change appointment etc. (which is presumably cheaper than missed appointments?)
But I'm aware some people can't manage the computer email and passcode to letter bit and need that bit of paper.
I have no doubt there is a lot of inefficiency in places and that needs to be addressed, but mainly I have very sympathy for stretched admin, desperate patients, complex mix of NHS/private.
No doubt a lot of it is down to how good the management/IT management is in any given place and good management and training can produce better results.
But in transition the "wasting money" is complex, because to change managers and train up admin and medical staff takes a good deal of time, and that is something they often do not have,
and it may (regrettably) in the short term be cheaper to lumber on with an older system rather than the cost of staff time involved in the changes - or the difficulty and cost in releasing staff for training etc when staff and patients alike under so much pressure.