Rosie51
Glorianny how about a speed dating event for "female lesbians", is that clear enough or are the transwomen going to claim to be female? We know India Willoughby, who you quoted in your justification for calling LGB alliance a hate group, does assert that they now have female chromosomes from taking oestrogen.......
Incidentally I don't remember you addressing the point raised by someone up thread (sorry I can't remember who it was) that the Charity Commission upheld LGB alliance's charity status. Are you accusing them of endorsing a hate group?
Any Speed dating event can be advertised as its organiser wishes as long as it is in line with legal provision
I think India Willoughby is interesting.
She said this
WILLOUGHBY believes the backlash was highly co-ordinated and sophisticated. She pointed to a well-documented meeting in America in October 2017 when the Family Research Council – labelled an “anti-LGBT hate group” – held its annual Values Voter Summit. Trump spoke, along with his far-right adviser Steve Bannon. One presentation discussed the LGBT community and “divide and conquer” tactics.
Speaker Meg Kilgannon said: “For all its recent success, the LGBT alliance is actually fragile and the trans activists need the gay rights movement to help legitimise them.” She went on: “Trans and gender identity are a tough sell, so focus on gender identity to divide and conquer.” For many people, Kilgannon claimed, “gender identity on its own is just a bridge too far. If we separate the T from the alphabet soup we’ll have more success.”
You might also like her views on prisons
When it comes to women’s safety, Willoughby says: “The biggest problem is men, but I’m not going to say all men are dangerous.” On the Bryson case, she says no convicted rapist should ever serve time in women’s prisons. Rules should prevent sex offenders being sent to women’s prisons
As for the Charity Commision they asked thatLGB Alliance revise some of its social media activity
During the course of the registration case, the Commission noted some evidence of social media activity (information that was posted or re-posted on social media) by LGB Alliance and considered that some of the language used may be regarded as inflammatory and offensive. In addition, it was not immediately obvious how some of these postings furthered any of the LGB Alliance’s purposes. The Commission was concerned that, although it promoted the rights of some groups, the activity appeared to involve, at times, demeaning or denigrating the rights (recognised by law) of others.
38.The Commission raised these concerns with LGB Alliance and in response LGB Alliance reviewed and revised its social media policy. LGB Alliance stated that it intended to adopt a less defensive and confrontational approach to social media engagement
So possibly what was becoming a hate group has modified its stance to achieve charity status