Or to puff up their ego making loud noises about inclusivity, kindness, agency, love, individuality, acceptance, suicide, etc. just so those very people can feel good about themselves?
I think that those making the money were very easily able to tap into the egos of this group and manipulate them to become the 'flying monkeys' of the agenda. The reason I think this is because of the language (exactly as Namsnanny describes) which was used by the flying monkeys to show themselves as caring individuals who have a 'right on' agenda that sets them apart from those who asked questions and refused to comply with the anti-feminist agenda, who were portrayed as old, out of touch, right wing (even compared to Nazis on here), homophobic, small minded, exclusionary and more. This was done in ways that positioned the flying monkeys as the opposite of those things - ie young (or young at heart), finger on the pulse, leftie, open-minded, inclusive etc.
As for who's behind it all, I don't know what Bill Gates has to do with any of it, but he gets the blame for all manner of nonsense, so I'm not remotely convinced that he's involved. Big Pharma is a definite possibility, but it seems more likely to me that it is an extension of the tide of misogyny that has swept the world in a backlash against the progress made by feminism. The idea that anyone can be a woman, that women should have no spaces to call our own, that we shouldn't be able to prove discrimination as no figures will exist that show the differences between the way males and females are treated - all of that, plus the eradication of women from the language smacks of raw hatred of women, and the flying monkeys have been complicit in that, as well as in the sacrifice of children and other vulnerable people to their cause. I don't think they necessarily intended that consequence, but their egos were so fragile and they were so desperate to tell the world how 'kind' they are that they just didn't care.
PS What has Namsnanny's daughter or DIL got to do with this?