CoolCoco
Some posters are continually making sniping remarks about women who complain of harassment as asking for it, bitching about Meghan, Diana, Fergie, but somehow making any negative comments about Catherine’s photo is being unsupportive of women. Either the RF are in the public eye and will be gossiped about, as they are frequently on here, or they cash it in and go and live on Capri. They aren’t forced into this role, they aren’t divine beings, they have a choice. I have no personal interest in the RF , they are an anachronism as is the House of Lords and the sooner the institution of monarchy withers away the better, but if you want one they are there to be photographed and discussed it comes with the territory. I made the shallow remark about the cannula to show the level of gossip I’ve heard over the last day or two. She just had surgery it wouldn’t be surprising if she still had the marks. So what - it might have been one reasonable reason for the photoshopping. Yes, let’s stop the gossip, but guess what next time she appears in a photo there will be headlines gushing about her outfit or how good she looks etc
I have no personal interest in the RF , they are an anachronism as is the House of Lords and the sooner the institution of monarchy withers away the better, but if you want one they are there to be photographed and discussed it comes with the territory.
As far as I am aware, every individual in the UK has a right to privacy about their medical history.
I am always informed by the NHS about who will be able to access my data, and with whom it will be shared. I assume it's exactly the same if you are being treated privately.
Being endlessly papped by the media, either legitimately or without consent, during walks to church, attending this or that event, appearing at State functions, is - yes - all part of the territory that goes with the job. The public and therefore the media have an insatiable appetite for all-things-Royal which, I'm sure, the RF are aware of.
But they, surely, should have the same right as every other person in the UK when it comes to medical matters. They should have complete autonomy over their medical history.
I too believe the RF are an anachronism, but that doesn't alter the fact that I also believe Charles and Catherine should be allowed to determine how much information they share about their conditions - like everyone else. Only those directly affected need to know the details.
What "right" is being abused by the RF in not sharing the intimate details of their condition with the general public? And by what right are the public demanding access to it? Where is it written that members of the RF are obliged to share their medical data with the nation?
Suggestions that giving out more details will put an end to the speculation are nonsense. If these two members of the RF share more details - the more the public will speculate and hypothesise as they pick over the further details that are released, because their appetite is voracious and unappeasable.
