When someone prefaces a comment with, I was brought up to believe, or - my mother always taught me that..., it's a provocation. Because the person commenting is suggesting that their mother, or whoever brought-them-up, has some special pipe-line to the truth which we should treat with some respect.
Weren't we all brought up by guardians or parents who taught us to believe whatever subjective opinions they had?
And, frankly, to pose such a question - "should women have equal pay and opportunities" when women through the centuries have fought to be recognised as an equal half of the population rather than a subservient to men, is a tad insulting.
I wonder if Bumface would like to return to the days when women seldom owned property because it was entailed to the male heirs; where women who were not lucky enough to marry had to either become governesses or, if they hadn't had much of an education - menials for the upper classes? Without equal pay and opportunities, how would women support themselves if they didn't have a "breadwinner" to keep them?
... as for men always having the final decision in family matters - why? Are they characteristically infallible because they are men?
Positing this notion in the 21st century among a group of women who have campaigned and fought to shake off the straightjacket of second-class citizenship - some of whom are highly educated professional women - is just provocative.
... and ridiculous. Women have, for various reasons, been both breadwinner, mother and homemaker, all at the same time for decades now. That they should for some reason, because of their biology, have less pay, less opportunities, is absurd.