Anniebach
Where media attention should be, on the Invictus Games
I agree.
What though is preventing the media from headlining an article on them?
I believe Nigeria is the first African nation to participate - that's newsworthy. They, the media, could write a lot about the games and the participants - and the events. They could also, quite legitimately, mention Harry as Patron, simply as a fact - without any accompanying photo's of him.
So - why don't they? Why, instead, are there endless column inches chanelling the thoughts from 'palace insiders', Paul Burrell, royal-watchers and 'experts' - all focused on Harry - who then is slated for making it all about him?
I'm not defending the man's past behaviour - but who is making it 'all-about-Harry' if not the media itself?
He (Harry) issues a statement about not seeing his father - or his press do on his behalf - in answer to the numerous enquiries made on the matter to his press agent. Who is making these enquiries? Did you 'phone up to ask? Has GN been calling for an update? Or is it the media who have been demanding information?
... dramatic gossipy headlines about Harry make better copy than informative articles about the Invictus Games, that's the reality.