I was wondering (again) if politicians in these modern times need a certain sex appeal in order to be noticeable or taken to be trustworthy.
I know past male prime ministers have not always been an oil painting eg Harold Wilson or Winston Churchill but then they were not photographed as much with the limitations of paper newspapers etc.
Were David Cameron or Tony Blair successful because they were youngish and handsome. They had that little twinkle in the eyes that people might have found appealing. Compare to Michael Foot and his shambling appearance and his lack of success.
Keir Starmer, to my mind, looks boring and stolid and not the dynamic leader we need to get us out of this rut we are in.
Do you think a physical image is more important than policies these days? Love to hear your thoughts.
Bereavement wipes out everything



