Gransnet forums

Chat

Petition to save the winter fuel payment

(133 Posts)
sharon103 Tue 30-Jul-24 15:32:03

Please feel free to sign this petition to try to save the winter fuel payment for pensioners if you would like to. Link provided.
Thank you.

www.change.org/p/save-the-winter-fuel-payment

Aldom Thu 01-Aug-24 09:35:46

I have signed the ageuk petition. It fits with my way of thinking. Personally I'm fortunate enough to not need the WFP nor do many people I know. But there are thousands of people who will suffer badly this winter if they are denied this payment.

Beckett Thu 01-Aug-24 10:19:58

Like others I don't need the WFA, however, in the past I ,like many others, donated it to charities which help families struggling with their bills. My concern is whether these charities will be able to continue their work without those donations.

There is also the problem of those pensioners who are just above the threshold for pension credit, how will they manage in the winter?

I thought the Labour party were the party of the working class, yet here they are attacking some of the most vulnerable in society

Witzend Thu 01-Aug-24 10:30:48

pascal30

Casdon

I don’t think reinstating a universal benefit paid to those who don’t need it as well as to those who do is the answer. I would sign a petition to change the financial threshold for eligibility for pension credit.

me too

And me.

Gummie Thu 01-Aug-24 10:41:40

It won't help. They are going for the pensioners as it is a group that has no power to fight back. All those pensioners who voted for Labour or Reform because they wanted to slap the Tories are now reaping what they sowed.

Our pension savings will be next.

Mt61 Thu 01-Aug-24 10:44:24

sharon103

Please feel free to sign this petition to try to save the winter fuel payment for pensioners if you would like to. Link provided.
Thank you.

www.change.org/p/save-the-winter-fuel-payment

Signed & donated 👍🏻

Mynxie Thu 01-Aug-24 11:32:32

I won’t be signing but I do think it should have been stopped from next winter rather than this to give those who need to the opportunity to save all year an extra few pounds a week or whatever towards their winter bills

veejay Thu 01-Aug-24 12:19:04

I won't be signing ,unless it's to raise the threshold for people just above the limit,
I agree with means testing ,but take it off those who are very ell off and don't obviously need it
I get pension credit so not well off , but they are taking it off the wrong people
The first thing David Cameron did when he became PM was reduced the WFA by £200

HelterSkelter1 Thu 01-Aug-24 12:24:27

I think we should all wait till the first budget and then see how everything pans out. Knee jerk reaction so far.

Madgran77 Fri 02-Aug-24 09:49:54

Casdon

I don’t think reinstating a universal benefit paid to those who don’t need it as well as to those who do is the answer. I would sign a petition to change the financial threshold for eligibility for pension credit.

So would I! I think the issue is the low threshold for pension credit. That is a separate issue and not a justification for giving substantial sums of money to people who don't need it just because of their age. I hope they cancel the stupid Xmas bonus too!

CassieJ Fri 02-Aug-24 10:17:30

signed.

I retire this year on just state pension, but due to the "new" pension, it puts me something like £3-4 over the limit to claim pension credit or any other help

BevSec Fri 02-Aug-24 13:11:00

Veejay, which of us. “Dont obviously need it” please?

Madgran77 Fri 02-Aug-24 19:30:31

BevSec

Veejay, which of us. “Dont obviously need it” please?

Pensioners who have a decent work pension just don't need it. I personally don't need it. I had a good job for which I get a good pension. I also get the old age pension. I should not be paid the fuel allowance. If that allowance was not universal then money would be available to substantially increase the pension credit threshold and ensure those that need it get the
Pension credit added to a higher income and get the fuel allowance as well.

I cant say what the pension credit thresholds should be but I am certain the thresholds should be higher than they are!

BevSec Fri 02-Aug-24 20:19:53

Madgran77, thank you for your reply. My own feeling is that it is a way of rewarding pensioners for paying taxes all our working lives. We pay tax on just about everything we buy, there is not much that is not taxed, we pay tax on money already taxed, all our working lives. RR is hitting on pensioners but then I knew she would.

mae13 Fri 02-Aug-24 20:47:02

I'm afraid Rachel Reeves has siezed upon the convenient rhetoric of some lucky pensioners who boast about not needing the Winter Fuel Allowance because they're so well off they're giving it to grandchildren!
Also we have younger people who whine about Rich Baby Boomers.......where are they, might I ask?

Once again it's women, mostly, who are being shafted.

Winter Fuel Allowance gone, next year the Fiscal Drag will see us paying Income Tax, the cap on care home fees is going too and let's not forget which sector of society is expected to step in and fill the gaps in care (I'm specifically thinking of unpaid carers), yes, women again.

Beggars belief.......

Fleurpepper Fri 02-Aug-24 20:51:29

Madgran77

BevSec

Veejay, which of us. “Dont obviously need it” please?

Pensioners who have a decent work pension just don't need it. I personally don't need it. I had a good job for which I get a good pension. I also get the old age pension. I should not be paid the fuel allowance. If that allowance was not universal then money would be available to substantially increase the pension credit threshold and ensure those that need it get the
Pension credit added to a higher income and get the fuel allowance as well.

I cant say what the pension credit thresholds should be but I am certain the thresholds should be higher than they are!

Same here. And I know millionaires and multis- who get it. I think it should be means tested.

HelterSkelter1 Fri 02-Aug-24 20:56:47

Perhaps it should be added to the state pension and then at least higher earners will be taxed on it.

Madgran77 Fri 02-Aug-24 21:21:15

BevSec

Madgran77, thank you for your reply. My own feeling is that it is a way of rewarding pensioners for paying taxes all our working lives. We pay tax on just about everything we buy, there is not much that is not taxed, we pay tax on money already taxed, all our working lives. RR is hitting on pensioners but then I knew she would.

I understand your point. However I dont think we should be rewarded for paying taxes. In my view we pay taxes to pay for the type of society we want with the facilities we want eg the NHS; schools; libraries; roads etc. (Well aware that standards may not be what we want!) And I think in a caring society our taxes should be used to help those on lower incomes including pensioners. But I do not think anyone should get payments from our taxes just because they are aging.

Madgran77 Fri 02-Aug-24 21:24:04

Same here. And I know millionaires and multis- who get it. I think it should be means tested

I was informed by an acquaintance that her extremely wealthy husband used it every year to get new skiing gear! She thought it was funny! Hmmm!

HelterSkelter1 Fri 02-Aug-24 21:29:40

Yes Madgran77. Not my words but tax is what we pay to live in a civilised society.

Means testing would probably cost as much to process as would be saved.

Madgran77 Fri 02-Aug-24 21:29:56

*mae13 I'm afraid Rachel Reeves has siezed upon the convenient rhetoric of some lucky pensioners who boast about not needing the Winter Fuel Allowance because they're so well off they're giving it to grandchildren!
Also we have younger people who whine about Rich Baby Boomers.......where are they, might I ask?*

Not necessarily rich but certainly comfortable and able to afford to pay for their own fuel! And yes I'm sure some give it to their grandchildren or whatever! Which just proves the point that they dont need it!

There ARE pensioners who don't need it. The issue though is that the pension credit threshold is too low. The fuel allowance should not go to all pensioners just because some pensioners really need it. It's about income not age!

Casdon Fri 02-Aug-24 21:30:33

From the ONS:

‘Economic status

When looking at economic status, the wealthiest households (measured by the median) were those where the head was retired (£489,300). Almost three-quarters of households with a retired head owned their home outright, compared with less than 30% of self-employed and less than 20% of employee-led households. With the highest levels of assets across all components of wealth, lower expenditure and a stable source of primary income, households with a retired head were more likely to better withstand impacts to household finances resulting from the coronavirus (COVID-19’

I can see no justification for paying a universal benefit to the richest section of the population. Of course this is average, and the poorest section of our age group needs to be supported better. To say that the WFA should be a reward for all pensioners is surely wrong though.

Madgran77 Fri 02-Aug-24 21:33:42

HelterSkelter1

Yes Madgran77. Not my words but tax is what we pay to live in a civilised society.

Means testing would probably cost as much to process as would be saved.

It possibly would initially but not long term. And I'm not even sure it would when records of who gets pension credits is already in the system! Which is another whole issue regarding joined up data across relevant departments

Primrose53 Fri 02-Aug-24 21:54:06

I won’t be signing as I don’t think it will make any difference at all. Too late now.

Doodledog Fri 02-Aug-24 22:51:48

HelterSkelter1

I think we should all wait till the first budget and then see how everything pans out. Knee jerk reaction so far.

I'm inclined to agree with this point of view. I absolutely disagree with means-testing, and I think this is a perfect illustration of why. People who have worked and paid into a small pension are being denied something that those who haven't are getting, so those who have are (understandably IMO) resentful. Not only that, but Pension Credit itself is a divisive benefit, as those who qualify get so many other things that someone on a few pounds more (that they've paid for) are denied, and this move compounds that agony.

Meanwhile, there are countless examples (anecdotal or declared) of people who 'don't need it', or who do need it but don't get it, but no definition of what 'need' means. People shouldn't have to prove need to get something they've paid for, and the idea of 'need' suggests a baseline subsistence level that means-testing will drag everyone down to, whether they have tried to save or not. It creates a race to the bottom.

The PR is terrible, and I'm very surprised at RR for not realising that, and at Keir Starmer for not advising her to wait before bringing this in. I hope they get new advisors sooner rather than later as this does not bode well.

All the same, I would like to see whether the budget has anything in store that will mitigate this. If not, I will happily sign, but I want to give the government a chance to get their feet under the table before working against them. They have a lot of problems to sort out before they can properly get going.

Sorry - that's very fence-sitting, which is not like me, but it's how I feel.

Elrel Fri 02-Aug-24 23:18:00

Have always thought it very wrong that all pensioners get the Fuel Allowance just because ‘it wouldn't be cost-effective to apply a means test’. Now maybe a sensible means test can be applied .