A while back now there was some muck-raking about George Clooney and his then wife-to-be, Amal.
The usual tabloid circus around a celebrity - lots of photo's of the couple together, but pretty harmless stuff basically.
However, I started to read the readers' comments and was shocked at the speculation and rumour-mongering. It was suggested by one reader that Amal was, in fact, a man disguised as a woman because - wait for it - Clooney as a declared bachelor would never marry as he was a closet gay, so Amal had to be a man, right?
There was a particular photo' of her leaving her house in a loose-fitting trouser suit and, if you looked carefully, you could - apparently - see the 'bulge'... "OMG, you are so right" declared another reader... "she defo is a man, who do they think they are kidding?". Amal was, allegedly, wearing the loose-fitting trouser suit in order to conceal that she was a he...
I suspect these two readers also believed similar, later, rumours that their twins were born via a surrogate mother.
I wanted to comment and point out that in fact it's not unusual for confirmed bachelors to marry when they find the 'right' woman, and that Clooney and Amal had a lot of interests in common - but I suspect it would've elicited a scornful response along the lines of me being "deluded", or not wanting to face the "truth" - so I didn't bother.
I loathe and detest this kind of gossip; "did you hear that ...", or "did you notice that..." etc, whether it's about my NDN, celebrities or the RF.
I'm neither stupid nor deluded - I know that human relationships can be complex and tangled. But starting a rumour with no evidence other than hear-say, or, in the case of Clooney and Amal, "look-see", is just ignorant, spiteful and evil.