Jeanathome
That's it really. People seem angry, territorial, and partisan.
I'm sure I recall a gentler ,kinder time.
... when was that time - according to your calculation?
I remember, in a rose-tinted kind of nostalgic way, when life appeared to be much simpler, although I'm not sure I even quite understand what I mean by that.
There may be some truth in what you say (and feel). I really don't know.
It's difficult, because communities still come together; there are all kinds of support-groups dotted around the country, and online, for all sorts of problems. And people still volunteer - give their time and energy freely.
???
This is just a very personal POV - I have no concrete evidence to support it, but - I have the nagging feeling that Margaret Thatcher set out to break the cohesion of the working class, something that bound people and communities together. Not because she was a spiteful individual, but because it was a necessary political manoeuvre to achieve the social, economic and political climate in which her policies would be successful.
We became individuals. The 'team' spirit (so to speak) became competitive because competitiveness is at the core of neo-liberal, free-market ideology.
The 'brotherhood' of earlier industrial communities - and I don't mean simply the brotherhood of the trades unions, but the solidarity between working families all engaged in the same pursuit / industry which was, I think, gradually lost as people had to compete for alternative jobs in an environment where financial support organisations were gradually cut back / eroded. I think the seeds of division were then planted.
And then of course came the internet - and social media, which gave everyone a platform in which to actually air their views, feelings, dissatisfaction, etc, etc. I believe it had a quite powerful and liberating effect - possibly even gave us a sense of power that we'd previously not had... anonymously we could say things that we might not have dared to say face to face. Those social and political ideas and thoughts which would previously have been confined to chats around the pub bar, in the office, or among family and friends... suddenly, we could address and challenge anyone and everyone - on anything.
And it's hard, it's difficult, when opposed or challenged online - especially if the terminology is in some way insulting, or the co-respondent questions your level of intelligence or your values - not to respond similarly. Thus, social media can be a cyber battleground of accusations, counter-accusations, insults, etc, etc. A place where kind and gentle folk maybe become alarmed at the sheer vitriol and nastiness that appears to be the social norm of communication.
But, in their private life away from the internet, are these people really unkind people? That's the question. I'm not sure (apart from obvious exceptions) that they are.
Anyway, as said, that's just my take on the matter.