LizzieDrip
Or do you mean these mae13 and eazybee:
eastangliabylines.co.uk/politics/the-first-6-months-what-has-labour-actually-done/
I’d actually say that’s quite a lot for 6 or so months.
.......and the charity foodbanks are apparently busier than ever.
The government - supposedly Socialist - are actively avoiding any reference to them, as if they are embarrassed by these facilities continuing existence when Starmer promised to deliver "Change".
Really? Labour is so much similar to the Tories that you couldn't get a bus ticket between them.
Do Starmer, Reeves and Rayner know where their nearest foodbank is?
LizzieDrip
Or do you mean these mae13 and eazybee:
eastangliabylines.co.uk/politics/the-first-6-months-what-has-labour-actually-done/
I’d actually say that’s quite a lot for 6 or so months.
Casdon
Other than an above inflation minimum wage rise and this do you mean mae13?
www.gov.uk/government/news/15-million-to-help-charities-get-spare-produce-to-those-in-need
😊😊
Casdon
Isn’t a community cupboard available to anybody, as a means of reducing food waste, rather than a foodbank, for which people have to be eligible though? I’d expect a lot of people would use a community cupboard to get free food?
Yes it is available to all, whether in need or not, one of its aims is to help reduce food waste.
keepingquiet
This government never proclaimed itself as socialist.
When Corbyn was leader he was hated for being too left and almost a Marxist. We lost an election and that was a disaster for this country.
Labour can't win. If they are left and socialist they lose votes, if they are centre and to the right they are labelled as just like the Tories.
Whichever, they will be accused of messing up, even when they have sound and even forward looking policies.
We were warned that things wouldn't get better very quickly, but people are used to the short-termism (which is a mirage anyway- look how long brexit took) and short-sighted policies that only make things better for those on the make.
We need stability and slow but steady change.
I think I'm wasting my time though, because this is probably just another thread for having a go...
Indeed it is! What did the previous govt achieve in their first 6 months??
I’m still waiting patiently for some positive results, which I think we won’t see for at least another year.
At risk of sounding naive/too leftie/a bit daft or with worse memory problems than I know I have ……. I remember attacks from ‘some of us’ on the Conservatives that were based on reality.
Like Cameron’s unnecessary austerity agenda wrecking public services, leading to the nhs/children’s services/adult social care/every aspect of the CJS / mental health/substance misuse services etc etc being effectively demolished.
Like Johnson’s number 10 partying while her majesty sat alone at her husband’s funeral
Some posters ( you know who you are) just want a good moan; scaremongering that Starmer is a Stalinist - don’t be daftn
Isn’t a community cupboard available to anybody, as a means of reducing food waste, rather than a foodbank, for which people have to be eligible though? I’d expect a lot of people would use a community cupboard to get free food?
nanna8
Starmer would support that.
Absolute nonsense
Our community cupboard has a queue all the time
You're right keeping quiet it's the inability to plan securely for more than 4 years that stymies steady growth. I don't know what the answer is except for more serious cross-party involvement in major projects, and keeping the relevant ministers in place for the lifetime of the parliament.
Rachel Reeves is signing up to railways and runways and reservoirs that will take a decade or more to build. Should Labour lose in 2028/29 (I sincerely hope they won't) and these schemes be under way but abandoned by an incoming government, then where will we be. Half the country dug up to no avail.
The foodbank I volunteer at isn't busier than ever: just saying.
I was reacting (with an element of sarcasm) to the post which claimed
if government attackers are allowed to get away with being more vocal
As you say Casdon, government attackers should be allowed to have their say, just as government supporters should. Only censorship would prevent government attackers from having freedom of speech.
Oreo
maddyone
if government attackers are allowed to get away with being more vocal
Perhaps free speech should be outlawed. People shouldn’t be allowed to express their opinions.Or only certain posters allowed to post 🤔
I bet there were plenty of grumbles on here when the Conservatives were last voted in, or am I wrong?
There’s room for all opinions on how this Labour government is doing and what we all think of their policies and performance.
Of course, there’s room for everybody, and that includes those who want to post about their pet hates, be it Brexit, Starmer, Blair, Johnson, Truss, Trump - or whatever. As long as they don’t lie about information that is factual.
nanna8
Change for better or for worse?
not easy to make positive changes after 14 years of disastrous ones, and not only coffers empty, but massive debts acrued on top.
maddyone
^if government attackers are allowed to get away with being more vocal^
Perhaps free speech should be outlawed. People shouldn’t be allowed to express their opinions.
Or only certain posters allowed to post 🤔
I bet there were plenty of grumbles on here when the Conservatives were last voted in, or am I wrong?
There’s room for all opinions on how this Labour government is doing and what we all think of their policies and performance.
Starmer would support that.
if government attackers are allowed to get away with being more vocal
Perhaps free speech should be outlawed. People shouldn’t be allowed to express their opinions.
”Because facts would burst their bubble”
Hear, hear growstuff👏👏👏
Casdon
Why don’t people check the facts before they post?
Because facts would burst their bubble.
No, you're not wasting your time keepingquiet. If government attackers are allowed to get away with being more vocal, people might begin to believe them (I think some already have). People need to be reminded what the government is doing - unfortunately, the government's PR is rubbish.
Why don’t people check the facts before they post?
This government never proclaimed itself as socialist.
When Corbyn was leader he was hated for being too left and almost a Marxist. We lost an election and that was a disaster for this country.
Labour can't win. If they are left and socialist they lose votes, if they are centre and to the right they are labelled as just like the Tories.
Whichever, they will be accused of messing up, even when they have sound and even forward looking policies.
We were warned that things wouldn't get better very quickly, but people are used to the short-termism (which is a mirage anyway- look how long brexit took) and short-sighted policies that only make things better for those on the make.
We need stability and slow but steady change.
I think I'm wasting my time though, because this is probably just another thread for having a go...
That’s disgraceful. 6 months on and they haven’t fixed everything the tories ruined over the past 14 years.
Has anyone got a magic wand they could lend the Labour Party 🤷♀️
Or do you mean these mae13 and eazybee:
eastangliabylines.co.uk/politics/the-first-6-months-what-has-labour-actually-done/
Other than an above inflation minimum wage rise and this do you mean mae13?
www.gov.uk/government/news/15-million-to-help-charities-get-spare-produce-to-those-in-need
The driving principle for voting in the last election was to get the Tories out; (I understand why) but many excellent MPs lost their seats, Labour has an unwarranted huge majority, there is no viable opposition and they are daily demonstrating their inadequacy in government.
Be careful what you wish for.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.