In the 18th century, "managing" personal needs while in public was a complex feat of engineering and social navigation. For the middle-class "ladies" mentioned in your image, the solution lay in a combination of specialized undergarments, portable vessels, and a strict social code.
1. Toilet Facilities: The "Bourdaloue" & Split Drawers
Contrary to modern assumptions, 18th-century ladies did not wear "panties" as we know them. They typically wore a shift (a linen smock) and numerous petticoats, but no closed undergarments.
Facebook
Facebook
The Bourdaloue: This was a portable, handheld chamber pot, often resembling a porcelain gravy boat. A lady could slip it under her skirts while standing or slightly crouching to relieve herself discreetly in a dark corner, behind a curtain, or even in a "retiring room" at a ball.
Split Drawers: By the late 18th and early 19th centuries, some women began wearing pantalettes or drawers, which were intentionally split at the crotch. This allowed them to use a chamber pot or commode by simply lifting their outer skirts without needing to undress or pull down undergarments.
The "Urinary Leash": Because public toilets for women were virtually non-existent until the mid-19th century, women were often on a "leash"—unable to travel further than the homes of friends or family where they knew a private chamber pot would be available.
2. Menstruation: "On the Rag"
Menstrual management was largely a private, DIY affair using materials at hand.
Rags and Clouts: Women used "menstrual cloths" or "clouts"—strips of absorbent linen, cotton, or flannel. These were folded and pinned or belted into place.
Sanitary Belts: To secure these cloths, women often wore a basic belt or piece of string around the waist, looping the fabric over the front and back.
The "Free Bleed" Myth: While some lower-class women may have had no choice but to bleed into their shifts, middle and upper-class women used layers of petticoats as a secondary defense to prevent stains from reaching their expensive silk or muslin outer gowns.
Social Isolation: During heavy flow days, many women simply stayed home or "retired" from social activities, citing a vague "indisposition" to avoid the risk of visible accidents at a ball or dinner.
commonplace.online
commonplace.online
+4
3. Public Spaces and "Lax" Pelvic Floors
The concern about "lax pelvic floors" mentioned in your image was a genuine medical worry of the time. 18th-century doctors often associated female health issues with "hysteria" or "weakness," and women who had many children were sometimes advised against overly vigorous dancing. However, the structure of corsets/stays provided significant core and back support, which may have inadvertently helped some women manage physical activity after childbirth.