Gransnet forums

Chat

Toilet in the 18 and 18th centuries

(97 Posts)
HelterSkelter1 Tue 17-Mar-26 09:32:00

I am watching the lovely Bennet Sister series. They go to balls in large houses. What on earth would they do about going to the loo. Long dresses, petticoats and bloomers. How on earth did they manage. Where would the facilities be? Did they have cloakrooms for the cloaks and also the equivalent of potties. Did they just not go out and certainly not to a ball in a white dress if menstruating.
And after having children would they risk dancing with perhaps a lax pelvic floor.

Did ladies type shops haberdashers etc have somewhere a lady could go to the loo if caught short while shopping for ribbons.
I am of course talking about middle class "ladies". I am sure the lower classes just got on with it.
In one episode someone remarks to Mary Bennet hat she "wouldnt want to relieve herself behind a screen" at the ball. What on earth did that mean.
I know we are often short of ladies loos in our towns now, but their life must have been a misery. Long coach or carriage journeys. Long walks that they always seemed to be doing.
I have seen a gadget ton Antiques Roadshow that you could use under a dress for weeing into on a carriage journey. How on earth would you do that privately? Imagine doing it on the 10.20 to Waterloo!

I would love Lucy Worsley to do a programme all about women's hygiene problems from Elizabethan times till now.

keepingquiet Tue 17-Mar-26 09:35:20

Long dresses covered a multitude of sins- think of a hole in the ground or any receptacle to hand and you could pee without anyone hardly noticing!

Knickers are a very recent invention!

Septimia Tue 17-Mar-26 09:40:56

I don't think they wore bloomers - probably didn't wear anything - and if they did they were open crotch ones.

My grandmother told a tale of seeing a woman in London (must have been before the First World War) stand over a drain with her legs slightly apart and pee.

At balls and similar events there were, apparently, screens with receptacles behind them for peeing in. Maybe they were more for men and the ladies withdrew elsewhere.

HelterSkelter1 Tue 17-Mar-26 09:41:29

But at a ball? With lots of women "ladies" in the same room. Buckets with servants to empty them outside?

HelterSkelter1 Tue 17-Mar-26 09:42:26

It's bad enough queuing at the theatre for the loo. Imagine if there were not any actual loos.

eddiecat78 Tue 17-Mar-26 09:51:31

George Bernard Shaw campaigned for public women's toilets in London but they wasn't until 1905!
I think that department stores like Selfridge's also provided them as they realised it would enable women to shop for longer

HelterSkelter1 Tue 17-Mar-26 10:12:31

I wonder what they had in Selfridges? I must Google flushing toilets and see when they came in. I think I had read that before that it enabled women to shop longer or at least get out of the house for longer. All helped towards women's emancipation.

RosiesMawagain Tue 17-Mar-26 10:17:15

In one episode someone remarks to Mary Bennet hat she "wouldnt want to relieve herself behind a screen" at the ball. What on earth did that mean
Just that, a chamber pot , but hopefully in a separate room, unlike the palace of Versailles in Louis XVI’s reign where you were lucky to be behind a curtain. .

Graphite Tue 17-Mar-26 10:38:44

The Bourdaloue.

janeaustensworld.com/2012/07/16/regency-hygiene-the-bourdaloue/

HelterSkelter1 Tue 17-Mar-26 11:17:48

Thank you Graphite. That explains a lot. Maybe one day it will be shown on TV how it was done. Maybe in this current series as they have mentioned the screen already.

Aveline Tue 17-Mar-26 11:40:38

I've got an old 'pair of drawers' which are literally that. Two separate legs which are joined by a drawstring at the waist. I expect the bottom bits would overlap but could easily be parted to permit the spending of a penny or more!

M0nica Tue 17-Mar-26 11:44:36

I am reading a book about the life in the late 18th/19th century.
Eavesdropping on Jane Austen's England Roy & Lesley Adkin, Abacus, 2013 Chapter 5 'Fashions and Filth' pp141-146

uite simply, regardless of sex or class. You went where you could. The streets were filthy with faeces and water courses were polluted (incuding streams peope used for drinking).

Alternatively,people retired up a uiet alley, or men just did it in public. In the home, women of the status of Jane Austen's famailies would have a commode in their bedroom. In large houses men would have a screened off area in the dining room, or sometimes just a pot in a pot cupboard that they would freely use during meal times and the male drinking sessions that might well follow.

Otherwise most houses would have an outside loo over a bicket or cesspit, which drained into a stream or had to be dug out and emptied regulalry. Generally referred to as the jericho, cerain house,

All told, forget any of our modern fear of everything to do with human excretion, our worries about cleanliness. In the period of Jane Austen, people simply went where they could when the need struck.

Bear in mind women then did not wear close crutched underwear and there was a reason for that. That did not come in until the late 19th century - and ueen Victoria did not approve.

J52 Tue 17-Mar-26 12:15:51

Sometimes in antique shops China ‘jugs’ are described as sauces boats, when in fact they were discrete 18th century receptacle's to urinate in when wearing a long dress.
It always amuses me.

HelterSkelter1 Tue 17-Mar-26 12:21:15

I am so relieved to be in the 21st century! Relieved being the operative word.

ClicketyClick Tue 17-Mar-26 12:23:03

It must have stank everywhere. We take everything for granted and I'm sure we wouldn't cope if we were transported back to another era.

J52 Tue 17-Mar-26 12:34:50

Here’s a picture of a Bourdaloue ( ruination receptacle) from the 18th century.

J52 Tue 17-Mar-26 12:35:28

Urination! Could be your ruination as well!

Fallingstar Tue 17-Mar-26 12:54:35

I think it must have been a world of many aromas back then. People didn’t bathe very often, wash their clothes frequently, or have deodorants, and the waft of the contents of chamber pot behind screens at a dance must have been eye watering. Also not to put too fine a point on it if a person defecated up an alley or in a pot at a dance how on earth did they clean themselves, my guess is that they couldn’t.
Hardly a romantic setting as is portrayed on screen though I suppose people were used to these aromas.
I believe that in certain countries today people do urinate and defecate on the street. Sue Perkins in a documentary about India a few years ago walked down a street full of human faeces and slipped and fell in it if I remember rightly.

TheSunRisesInTheEast Tue 17-Mar-26 12:59:20

I'm glad I'm not the only one to wonder about such things 😂. I wonder how homeless women get on while menstruating and when needing the loo in general, the poor souls are curled up in a ball, not moving for hours on end 😢. How do people get on in the middle of a packed crowd at music festivals eg. Glastonbury? I've heard of those "she-wee" things, but you couldn't possibly use that in a crowd 🫣😳.

Gwyllt Tue 17-Mar-26 13:07:15

A few years ago we were looking at houses. One that we viewed had a double toilet. Two seats side by side. Can’t remember if there was a flush system or either water was carried to it in a bucket

keepingquiet Tue 17-Mar-26 13:08:19

Not so far away- as a child we only had an outside toilet- so during the night we had a bucket upstairs on the landing.

It was disgusting and sometimes I got the job of emptying it!

It was 1975 when we finally had an upstairs toilet, and another one downstairs. What luxury!

Some people don't know they are born.

And on that subject, anyone here been to France??

Maremia Tue 17-Mar-26 13:34:05

France has elegant fashion, wonderful food, sensuous perfume...but the toilets!!!!!

Maremia Tue 17-Mar-26 13:35:53

Stone castles had 'toilet' rooms, from which the 'produce' dropped into the moat.

JamesandJon33 Tue 17-Mar-26 13:39:12

At balls etc they had a Ladies retiring room. China pots behind screens .

WithNobsOnIt Tue 17-Mar-26 13:40:06

Maybe they did what 500 million Indians still do and pee and poo in the street?