I'm not sure who it is people are blaming but many seem to think someone or a group of someone's are to blame with the caveat that it's "nothing to do with me guv". And yet our generation has known for decades that we were moving to a post-industrial society and that we need education appropriate to that.
The modern mass-education system developed alongside industrialisation. It was not simply designed to teach people facts; it also helped produce a population able to function in a large, organised, increasingly bureaucratic economy.
Its characteristic features include:
• Age-based cohorts: children progress through school in groups.
• Standardisation: common curricula, examinations, and credentials.
• Time discipline: timetables, bells, attendance, deadlines.
• Specialisation: subjects divided into distinct areas of knowledge.
• Selection: qualifications used to sort people into further education and occupations.
• Teacher as authority: knowledge is largely transmitted from an expert to learners.
This model has obvious strengths. It can provide broad access, shared knowledge, socialisation, and a relatively reliable way of preparing people for complex work. But it was built for a world in which knowledge was relatively scarce, occupational roles were more stable, and learning was expected to happen mainly before employment.
Many of the people posting here have posted in support of exactly this system. We really needed to understand the needs of a post-industrial society. What education do we need for a society where the economy, technology, and ways of working are changing beyond the industrial model that shaped mass schooling?