nanna8
Phones have to be paid for and charged so I can understand why, when you are very poor and don’t have enough food to eat, you might get questioned for being able to pay for one- particularly if it is a very up to date one. After the war when we were poor we didn’t have phones - not until the late 1960s when things eased up a bit. All our money went on food and the house. We certainly didn’t own a tv.
After the war TVs were a huge luxury, and weren't in most homes until the 50s. The same applied to phones - there would have been few people to call if you had one. But there were functioning call boxes on the end of every street, and nobody expected people to be contactable round the clock.
Yes, phones have to be charged, and there will be no charging points in a tent, but that should be taken up with the DWP, who insist that claimants are contactable. And as MissA says, being poor does not necessarily equate to living in a tent.
Serious question - as fashions in phones fluctuate (eg large screens, small screens, flip screens, colours etc come and go) how many posters would know 'the latest' phone from a distance if someone were using it in a queue? Or even whether someone else's phone is 'up to date'?
