Gransnet forums

Coronavirus

Should lockdown for the over 70s be extended when it’s relaxed for everyone else?

(222 Posts)
Masquereader Thu 30-Apr-20 16:40:56

I feel very strongly that it shouldn’t. The main argument for keeping the over 70s under indefinite lockdown seems to be that it’s for our own protection, and I feel quite able to take responsibility for that myself. I understand the reasons for social distancing and I’ve followed it so far; but I’m also concerned about my mental health if I can see no end to it. What do you think?

bikergran Fri 01-May-20 07:14:35

There are and always has been a large number of (who I imagine are 70 or over) coming in the supermarket every week.

There is a chap I know he is well over 70 comes in most days for a loaf of milk just a bits of something, he wears a mask, he has lung problems, I would imagine copd type illness.

His wife has lung problems. but yet! he comes in most days.

He tries to come near me and lifts his mask up to talk to me!!
I used to chat to him at school, when I see him approaching I move well away into another area.

Im afraid telling this man the dangers, is like talking to a solid brick wall. and yes he could have people doing his shopping for the family.his dd and gc live with him and his wife.
But unfortunatlty he is one of the "I won't get the virus brigade" ! confused

growstuff Fri 01-May-20 07:23:15

The government is going to save quite a bit in pension payments sad

Puzzler61 Fri 01-May-20 07:35:52

I would be interested to see medical evidence to show percentage of risk for groups within the over 65’s population.
I’d be surprised if a fit, healthy 70 yr old (just for e.g.) has a weaker immune system than a smoker or an obese person (also for e.g.) of 50 yr old. We have been told previously by Experts that obesity is a bigger killer than cancer.

Puzzler61 Fri 01-May-20 07:46:26

It’s all very complicated and I’ll just stay in - other than a walk - until a vaccine is available. I hope us “oldies” will be near the top of the list for getting the vaccine, after NHS, Carers, and key workers.

BlueBelle Fri 01-May-20 08:06:27

Oh gosh puzzle you are going to be in a loooong time there will probably be no vaccine before next year, then who wants to take the chance with something so new and so hurried and who knows how effective it will be it really can’t all hinge on a vaccine
I m not a rule breaker and if over 70 s are ordered to stay in obviously I will but if there’s a choice I would rather not and as most of you will all be in your houses still, I won’t harm any of you will I ? and if you re worried about me taking up a bed as none of the nightingale hospital have barely been used even at the very height of the virus I m not expecting it to be overrun by the few old folks that prefer to get on with their limited years left even if in a different way than expected
I m quite understanding that I probably won’t be able to return to work, visit the theatre or cinema, or a restaurant but if I can have a picnic with a few friends (social distancing of course) I will do so
Th acts just me and not suit everybody

Ginny42 Fri 01-May-20 08:40:27

I'm not a scientist or a medic, but read that it's about our T-cells which decrease with age. T- cells, so called because they originate in the thymus, attack any virus and if we don't have enough of them, the virus will overwhelm the immune system. We can boost our immune system but not increase the T-cells.

It's not about whether you're prepared to risk your own life, but whether you're prepared to risk causing the deaths of others who love you or who care for you when you are so ill.

Yes, people have been recovering and leaving hospital after days on respirators, but I know of one 77 year old who after 16 days in an ICU has needed intensive medical support to learn to breathe and even to walk again. He's due home soon and will have 4 sessions of physiotherapy per day at home.

Some of us clap each week for the NHS workers who give selflessly day by day and yes- many have now died as a result of doing their job. Why risk their lives too?

Hetty58 Fri 01-May-20 08:48:03

Puzzler61, please understand that 'fit and healthy' is not much defence against this. Our immune systems change with age, regardless of our lifestyles.

Interestingly, smokers (who you'd think would be dropping like flies) have some protection. They are only half as likely to be hospitalised or die. There is current research into nicotine patch therapy.

'Normal' rules don't apply with Coronavirus. Symptoms are most similar to altitude sickness and still, very little is known about it.

Puzzler61 Fri 01-May-20 08:49:14

BlueBelle - DD2 has bought 12 new jigsaw puzzles and had them sent, so I’ll be alright indoors for a good while ?

Puzzler61 Fri 01-May-20 08:54:24

Hetty, I hear what you say. But chatting about age with my doctor he said that people age at different rates, so to judge by age alone seems too simplistic?

BlueSky Fri 01-May-20 09:11:55

Anyway I doubt we will be 'forbidden' as such, if they want to actually forbid all over 70s to leave the house (except for food, medication and exercise) then they will have to fine us!

growstuff Fri 01-May-20 09:19:30

Puzzler That's why people over 70 aren't automatically being asked to shield themselves. There is a list of specific health conditions on the government website.

People over 70 and those with certain underlying conditions are at higher risk of being affected badly, so are being strongly advised to take precautions such as staying indoors.

There's a lot of confusion because the terminology and advice has changed. Even the text sent to people in this second group is confusing (I've had one).

There is no denying that age and health conditions are risk factors. It doesn't matter what the government says. The virus itself isn't listening.

Ideally, every single person would be socially isolated until the infection rate is nil. Obviously, that's not possible, so there has to be a balance. It's because some people want to tip that balance that the general environment remains unsafe for the most vulnerable.

This won't all be over after 12 weeks for anybody, including those currently "grounded" for 12 weeks. Places like care homes and sheltered housing for the elderly probably need to create protective bubbles. At least people would then be able to circulate within the bubble.

growstuff Fri 01-May-20 09:20:53

No problem, BlueSky. Quite a few of you will die angry.

Puzzler61 Fri 01-May-20 09:30:49

Growstuff, a lot of your points are valid but not when you say it doesn’t matter what the government says. It does, cos they set out the guidelines most of us are trying to follow.

Soniah Fri 01-May-20 09:47:52

People say this isn't a life but it is up to you to make it a life you can enjoy

SusieFlo Fri 01-May-20 09:48:40

That makes sense! I haven’t fully understood the term herd immunity before. Thanks!

wallers5 Fri 01-May-20 09:51:51

No! Some of us still have jobs and Grandchildren to help out with.

BlueSky Fri 01-May-20 09:53:03

Growstuff I've never said I personally would go against whatever is made mandatory! Just saying that that would be the only way to stop people going out if they are not allowed to, and hefty fines like some places in Europe and Australia!

halfpint1 Fri 01-May-20 09:54:09

In France, as far as I know , there is NO age restrictions in the new regulations for May 11th .
Maybe Grandma Moira could say where she got the information from

Masquereader Fri 01-May-20 09:55:47

Is mental health not an issue?

mernice Fri 01-May-20 09:58:41

We are doing it for OTHERS not just ourselves and not primarily ourselves.
We are more likely to succumb and NEED A HOSPITAL BED!
That’s the issue.
I get so cross with the ‘John Humphrey brigade’.

Paperbackwriter Fri 01-May-20 10:01:50

"End of"? Hetty58 Rather aggressive and childish, don't we think? Can do without that, thank you.

kevincharley Fri 01-May-20 10:02:30

A lot of people seem to be missing the point. Yes, lockdown is to help prevent individuals becoming ill but it's mainly about keeping others safe.
Yes, you can go out and take the consequences of becoming ill, or maybe dying. But if you take this stance you're possibly going to infect others who may themselves die.
Are you really prepared to have someone else's death on your conscience? Think, if you knocked over and killed someone whilst driving, how terrible you'd feel, this is no different.
Lockdown is for a few short weeks out of a lifetime. It's not much to ask of anyone.
Don't be selfish, stay at home.

mernice Fri 01-May-20 10:02:39

Just a note.....however fit we are our immune systems decline with age. That’s a fact apparently!

Lynnyb Fri 01-May-20 10:03:59

This is an interesting point made in a mid April report from ONS which only covers March figures: "The rate of death due to COVID-19 increased significantly in each age group, starting from age 55 to 59 years in males and age 65 to 69 years in females; overall, one in five deaths were in age group 80 to 84 years."

Hopefully the statisticians will let us have detailed information that we can use to make our own decisions about what to do when lockdown rules begin to relax. I heard a radio report more recently that said 90% of Covid deaths were people aged over 60! I wonder if that is true?

BusterTank Fri 01-May-20 10:05:33

If that's your opinion go out and get on with your life but don't start whinging if you catch it . As you say your a grown woman , with a mind of your own . Do you really think the government says , I know let's pick on the over 70s . They are asking you stay at home because it's the right thing to do but you could be selfish and go out and put more stress on the NHS .