If you're so happy with 50,000+ deaths and rising, Callistemon, then so be it. I think that a lot of people are of the strong opinion that had the whole episode been better managed from the start there would have been fewer deaths. I don't think that staggering a huge death toll over more months in order to 'ease the strain on the NHS' should have been the only objective. I don't recall if it was billed as such.
I do, though, recall talk of doing our best to minimise deaths from the virus until such time as a vaccine had been developed.
I realise that there might never be a vaccine, but the objective of minimising deaths and controlling the spread oof the virus seems to be a rather more appealing one than letting it sweep through the population, with deaths in the 100s of 1,000s, in the vague hope of producing herd immunity.
A hope which, in view of persistent human susceptibility to past scourges, such as smallpox, TB, diphtheria etc which was only halted by the development of effective vaccines, seems to be even more forlorn that the hope of developing a vaccine.