I wouldn't believe everything Dominic Cummings said, nor what any Government said. There was a lack of "evidence", a "no, I am not letting you see the messages," and an agenda to put the knife into his enemies. Somehow, by lack of information, we are to believe that Mr Gove was innocent of all the accusations (anybody smell a rat) and that with all the concern DC had, he was happy to break the rules with his trip to Durham Castle.
There were lots of accusations which, as part of a conversation and in context, would be perfectly acceptable. Anybody in charge of an economy might ask whether we should lock everything down when it was a specific part of the population who was affected. That would not mean I wasn't going to protect the ones who would be disproportionately affected.
In the early days, I was more dismissive of the affects of the virus because we had heard of so many potentially life threatening viral infections before which had come to nothing. There is no doubt we were complacent but I have seen little to suggest that any other Government would have done differently.
Hindsight is such a wonderful thing so I am more inclined to wait for a proper wide reaching inquiry to get a balanced version of events.