To compare, as the lawyer did, the outfits worn by the Ku Klux Klan with that of the niqab is, I think, ridiculous. The purpose of the KKK's "uniform" was to conceal their identity since they carried out terrorist acts against black people and their supporters. People wearing motorcycle helments do so for a specific purpose, and to wear a cycle helmet when one is not on a motorcycle is not required by law, or resulting from a cultural norm or religious belief.
Before anyone states that the koran does not require the form of dress adopted by these women, all religions are open to interpretation. Most christian people are willing to undergo a blood transfusion but jehovah's witnesses interpret the bible in such a way that they are not. The church of England and catholic church have difficulties with women holding certain positions within the church. Some jewish people have a very strict interpretation of their scriptures and dress and behave very differently from other jewish people. What the majority have in common is their unwillingness to treat women as equals.
It appears that a great deal of the comments in favour of criminalising the wearing of a niqab arise because of the posters' own feelings about it, rather than as a genuine concern for the women who wear them. These women are, supposedly, responsible for making someone else feel "exposed, vulnerable and intimidated", their form of dress equated with "voyeurism", their actions described as "bloody stupid", "bad mannered" "anti social" and as "unsuitable" for the so-called caring professions. In the face of this kind of hostility, is it any wonder that muslim people withdraw even further from a society that treats them with such disdain?
The idea that we should have a "magnanimous dictator who will rid us of the things that are not of our culture" I find truly worrying. Who decides what behaviour is "of our culture" and therefore permissible, and what steps should be taken to "rid" us of such behaviour?