Gransnet forums

Education

State schools and Question time

(64 Posts)
winterwhite Sun 10-Jun-18 10:34:37

What mediocre schools need as well as good teachers is the support of engaged parents committed to improvement.

What is disguised as ‘doing one’s best for one’s children’ in this case actually means buying them advantages over those with whom in later life they will have to compete.

IM0 particularly reprehensible when MPs behave in this way. They are the ones who decide the system for everyone else.

Anniebach Sun 10-Jun-18 10:31:39

I agree Chewbacca

Joelsnan Sun 10-Jun-18 10:28:46

I think good education is a combination of well educated and inspiring teachers and a strong work culture. There are excellent state schools and poor public schools.

kittylester Sun 10-Jun-18 10:26:34

Quite chewbacca!

Chewbacca Sun 10-Jun-18 10:24:11

Personally I have no problem with sending children to either grammar or private schools. My problem lies in MPs who want to abolish such schools as being elitist, but who have no compunction in sending their own. I fail to see how this is anything other than hypocrisy.

Anniebach Sun 10-Jun-18 10:21:18

It depends on your income surely , if you can’t afford to pay for your children’s education you have to send them to state schools regardless .

Grandma70s Sun 10-Jun-18 10:16:55

It partly depends where you live. My son went to a comprehensive that was reasonably good. He now lives in London, and the state schools near him are not good at all. He has (reluctantly) sent his children to selective private schools, at huge cost. I think he’s right. All he wants is a decent education for his children.

In an ideal world, all schools would be good. In the real world, it’s not the case. What does one do? Sacrifice the children’s education on the altar of an abstract principle?

Anniebach Sun 10-Jun-18 10:04:19

Emily Thornberry

She sent her children to private schools and said - I want the best for my children and all children . This on being asked why she was against grammer schools !

Greyduster Sun 10-Jun-18 09:57:50

As Kitty says, no-one should be surprised, but the hypocrisy of these people is jaw dropping!

Chewbacca Sun 10-Jun-18 09:55:36

Diane Abbott
Harriet Harman

Comprehensive schools are great for kids. Just not THEIR kids.

Chewbacca Sun 10-Jun-18 09:50:44

Valerie Vaz not Valley

Chewbacca Sun 10-Jun-18 09:50:11

Angela Rayner
Valerie Valley
Debbie Abrahams

All socialists. All send their children to private schools.

kittylester Sun 10-Jun-18 09:39:11

Why are you surprised?

PamelaJ1 Sun 10-Jun-18 09:37:57

Like Rod Liddell of the Times I was impressed by Shami Chackrabati’s answer to the question on the benefits of comprehensive schools. Look where it got her after all.
I must admit that I did wonder where her children were educated but gave her the benefit of the doubt.
She spends £20,448/year to send them to Dulwich College.
Do what I say, not what I do?