Gransnet forums

Education

Grammar schools - 1960s/1970s

(197 Posts)
CariadAgain Tue 02-Sept-25 18:41:26

I was surprised to read recently that the selection process was biased against girls. I had just been assuming that one either passed and went to grammar school or didnt pass and didnt go to grammar school.

Then I read recently that less boys were passing than girls and so what often happened was they told the "lowest pass level" girls that they hadn't passed (even though they had) and gave their places to boys who hadn't passed instead. It was more important to them to have that 50/50 girl/boy ratio than to be fair and, if you won a pass = you got it.

I had wondered why it felt like there was a bit of a kerfuffle after I sat the 11 plus. It boiled down to I'd said to my parents "If I don't pass the 11 plus - I want to go to the Convent School. I'm not going to go to the Secondary Modern". (Yep....I had no idea that would have cost money - and that would mean my mother wouldnt have been able to put as much money as she did into savings). I also had no idea my brother would certainly not have passed the exam when it was his turn.

I did pass - but I must have been one of the ones with a lowest level pass and the school were planning on giving my entrance pass to a boy who hadnt passed!!!!!!

Apparently the reason was because more girls passed than boys and they wanted 50% boys and 50% girls there - and hence they put in that unfair little clause.

It's a wonder I managed to pass in the first place - given I was an armed forces child and I think it was 7 primary schools I had in total because of that. So I remember my mother did go down to the school to "talk to" them - in other words tell them, I guess, to give my entrance pass to me and not someone less deserving that happened to be a boy.

I was more preoccupied at the time with the way I seem to recall children who passed had been promised a present - like a pushbike. So I was expecting a pushbike too (though I hadnt been promised anything at all) - and wasnt given a present at all for my pass.

westendgirl Wed 03-Sept-25 16:25:07

Not all Secondary Modern schools were poor.the one I taught at in the 60s/70s was first choice for a lot of parents. The pupils could do O levels as well as CSEs .All levels were catered for.

Paperbackwriter Wed 03-Sept-25 16:24:46

growstuff

All the grammar schools in my area were single sex, so there was no question of giving more places to boys to make sure there was a 50/50 split.

We had 3 grammar schools in our area, one each single sex and one co-ed. I'm pretty sure it was well known that the boys' school accepted boys with a lower pass mark than my all-girls' grammar school. All 3 schools were pretty good and so were our local sec mods. Several girls from the secondary schools joined our 6th form as they'd done well at O-level.

phantom12 Wed 03-Sept-25 16:21:32

I went to Grammar school in 1967. Six of us passed 3 girls and boys. I also would have hated not to pass and have to go to the secondary school. Rumour had it that you passed if your parents were farmers, had a shop or were just rich. I didn't come into any of those categories.

4allweknow Wed 03-Sept-25 16:17:30

Was early 60s. Passed but didn't want to go, wanted the secondary school. Had an awful strop with parents and Headmaster of primary. Best friends hadnt passed, but had top grades for other school. Parents gave in and I enjoyed every minute at Secondary. Given opportunity to move to other school when 15 to continue education. Took it up, best of both worlds.

Curlywhirly Wed 03-Sept-25 16:17:20

I went to a girls single sex grammar school. The boys grammar school was not too far away. All the girls used to go mad if they saw any young males near the school (even the poor unsuspecting gardeners, window cleaners, workmen etc). Looking back I don't think single sex schools prepare children for sone aspects of adulthood - we all thought young males were like aliens!

DS54 Wed 03-Sept-25 16:10:40

My area had single sex grammar schools, mine the girls’ had 3 forms of entry 96 places per year, my husband’s had 4 forms 128 places each year.

Elusivebutterfly Wed 03-Sept-25 16:00:29

I went to school in Kent where there were Technical schools as well as Grammars and Secondary Moderns. Those getting top marks in the 11+ went to Grammar and the next 10% went to Technical.

Those who just failed the 11+ could resit at 13 and go to the Technical school. Anyone in the top stream at the Secondary Modern who wanted to stay past 15 and take O levels could go to the Technical school and take the exams at 17 instead of 16.

The girls Grammar schools were strict and aspirational. The Secondary Moderns largely taught cooking, sewing, childcare and homecare. All schools were single sex.

Marydoll Wed 03-Sept-25 15:33:20

My Catholic grammar school was single, there was one for boys too.
The other grammar schools in our town were mixed.

Chocolatelovinggran Wed 03-Sept-25 15:25:53

In my area there are three grammar schools, one mixed, and two single sex, but there are other selective schools a short train ride away, so I don't know how that affects numbers allocated to boys or girls.
Neither I, nor any of my children, received a gift for their results at eleven, although my son's godmother sent him a book token the week after the tests to compensate him for having to take part in such a system!

CariadAgain Wed 03-Sept-25 15:19:15

Mirren

Probably explains an injustice that's made me cross all my life ... Which involved my Mum , not me .
Born in 1933 she was a bright child who passed the 11 plus easily and should have gone to the Grammar school like her big boy.
Unfortunately she was told there " wasn't a place" for her and she went to the local secondary modern.
A year later a place miraculously came available for her at the Grammar school. My Mum was always feisty and had settled so refused to go , on principle.
My grandparents obviously didn't have any high expectations of girls because they didn't encourage her to move.
She left school at 14 , becoming a window dresser and then learning typing and became a typist.
She was always highly intelligent.
The year I went to uni she was also accepted into Durham University to study to be a priest.
She was one of the first women ordained into the priest hood at, Durham Cathedral in about 1993 and worked as a priest until her retirement.
After retirement, with the support of my Dad , she followed an Open University course and managed to finish this after Dad died .
I had the great privilege of walking my Mum , in her cap and gown, across the stage at the Sage in Gateshead on the day she graduated and earned her degree.
She was 82, the oldest graduate they'd had and she was a bit wobbly on her pins.
Sadly,she died in 2018, still holding on to her dreams of completing her Masters.
How I miss my wonderful Mum .

Aw! re your mum. What a shame that there was that unfairness to her at the outset. Good for her that she did eventually get a job more worthy of her and did the OU course.

That was really nice that she got her degree eventually and that you were able to be with her then. I always think "Good for them" for anyone that obtains a major objective at the age at which most people are putting their feet up.

Alltogethernow Wed 03-Sept-25 15:08:22

I was considered very bright at middle school, I took tests and finished them faster than anyone else and still came out top of the class. But that was it. I was socially inept, terribly introverted and outside of maths pretty poor at anything else. I went to grammar school and from being top of the class at middle school I became fairly average. Outside of maths and languages which I excelled at (strange I know for an introvert) I was fairly poor at everything else.

My parents did nothing to encourage me to study and I soon became lazy. I did manage to pass all my ‘O’ levels. All at Grade C!

When people hear I went to grammar school (not from me) I say ‘I was just good at tests’

M0nica Wed 03-Sept-25 15:07:52

My DiL was the first child from her Secondary modern to go to University. This was in the early 1990s

Judhi Wed 03-Sept-25 15:05:36

All girls grammar so no problem

grandmac Wed 03-Sept-25 14:58:57

Some years after my children had taken the 11+ I was told that the primary school was informed that x number of children had passed and it was left to the teachers to choose which ones! I don’t know if this is true but for my children it felt like it. My son was bright, handsome and likeable. My two girls were also bright and attractive but both were left handed and I have since discovered dyscalculic, and disliked by the teachers. Guess who went to the grammar school!

Roswell Wed 03-Sept-25 14:58:53

I went to a single sex grammar school. No 11+ but had 3 interviews for maths, English and with the head. I think I got a place because my dad died when I was 8 and the headteacher kept a number of places for girls like me.

kjmpde Wed 03-Sept-25 14:43:25

all same sex in our area. I wish I was allowed to have gone to a comprehensive as there was a greater variety of subjects to study..n

seventhfloorregular Wed 03-Sept-25 14:39:17

I was looking forward to moving on to the girls grammar school - at our primary most girls in the top class each year went there.
Then our stupid local authority changed the system so had to go to the new junior high school which had been a secondary modern but systems weren't in place for the more academic children. It was awful. I was so unhappy there.
Fortunately at 14 you could choose to move to senior high and it was wonderful (eventually everyone had to go)

sazz1 Wed 03-Sept-25 14:37:24

I didn't have the 11+ exam as I think it was abolished the year I was supposed to sit it. I still went to grammar school, first 2 years at a girls school then brightest went up to the big old red brick grammar building. I was in top stream 1.1 my class was called. Loved school but left at 15 due to bad home life. So with a job I could leave school at 16. Grammar school was very progressive. Girls could learn woodwork or Metal work, and we were taught about racism and apartheid.

Mirren Wed 03-Sept-25 14:33:21

Probably explains an injustice that's made me cross all my life ... Which involved my Mum , not me .
Born in 1933 she was a bright child who passed the 11 plus easily and should have gone to the Grammar school like her big boy.
Unfortunately she was told there " wasn't a place" for her and she went to the local secondary modern.
A year later a place miraculously came available for her at the Grammar school. My Mum was always feisty and had settled so refused to go , on principle.
My grandparents obviously didn't have any high expectations of girls because they didn't encourage her to move.
She left school at 14 , becoming a window dresser and then learning typing and became a typist.
She was always highly intelligent.
The year I went to uni she was also accepted into Durham University to study to be a priest.
She was one of the first women ordained into the priest hood at, Durham Cathedral in about 1993 and worked as a priest until her retirement.
After retirement, with the support of my Dad , she followed an Open University course and managed to finish this after Dad died .
I had the great privilege of walking my Mum , in her cap and gown, across the stage at the Sage in Gateshead on the day she graduated and earned her degree.
She was 82, the oldest graduate they'd had and she was a bit wobbly on her pins.
Sadly,she died in 2018, still holding on to her dreams of completing her Masters.
How I miss my wonderful Mum .

Chaitriona Wed 03-Sept-25 14:32:03

In Scotland the equivalents were Senior and Junior secondaries. I was brought up in Edinburgh where even today a higher percentage of pupils go to fee paying schools than anywhere else in the UK. About a quarter of children. In the fifties these schools were boys or girls schools. But the corporations two free senior secondaries were co-educational and took children from a wide area across the city, many from working class homes. I had an excellent academic education in the one that covered the south side of the city. Boys of the privileged classes got an academic education in historic schools in the city. Some academic fee paying schools for girls had been created by feminists in the late nineteenth century but many privileged girls from middle class families went to small private girls schools where they were taught nothing much but how to be ladies. . So I was lucky in a way being a girl whose parents didn't have the money to pay for a private education. Women of my own age who went to these schools are often bitter about it. Most of these former boys schools are now co-educational and education and careers for girls are as important as for boys among the Edinburgh bourgeoisie. My former school is now the top performing state school.

Lathyrus3 Wed 03-Sept-25 14:28:52

Sheila11

Girls are always top of the class up to year 6. Boys are slower in reaching their potential, so more girls would always get higher marks, I think until they’re 13. I think that’s the age when boys level up.

Hence the attempt, some years back, to make the change to a first (5-8yrs), middle (9-12hrs) and Upper (13 onwards) educational system.

Lots of LEAs made that change but the introduction of the National Curriculum with its different age points put a stop to that.

No Cariadagain, I didn’t get any presents. The opportunity of a good education was considered a reward and privilege in our family.

I had to manage University without any parental contributions. But we did get tutition and a room and a meal in those days🙂 Like a lot of students these days I had a part time job to earn what I needed.

Stansgran Wed 03-Sept-25 14:28:22

I find it depressing that my single sex grammar school in Liverpool is still single sex and that they have a surprising number of girls with head covering. I’m thinking of suggesting they might like to have Posie Parker go to give them a talk. @Georgesgran your grammar school may have had a 13+ intake.

Humbertbear Wed 03-Sept-25 14:24:05

I went to a girls’ grammar school. All the grammar schools in the area were single sex. However, I came top in the 11 plus in our school and the HT was quite put out because they always gave a prize to ‘the top boy’ so that year they gave two prizes. One to me and one to the boy who came second. Even at 11 I knew what was happening.

missdeke Wed 03-Sept-25 14:22:31

growstuff

All the grammar schools in my area were single sex, so there was no question of giving more places to boys to make sure there was a 50/50 split.

Just what I was thinking, it just seemed to depend on places available. If you were at the lowest end of the passes and there were no spaces left then you didn't get to go to the grammar school. unless you were prepared to accept a place at a different school that did have places. I went to an out of area school simply because my sister was already there and it saved on the exhorbitant cost of the uniform as I wore her out grown clothes.

Sheila11 Wed 03-Sept-25 14:18:02

Girls are always top of the class up to year 6. Boys are slower in reaching their potential, so more girls would always get higher marks, I think until they’re 13. I think that’s the age when boys level up.