Smileless -- "And don't pretend HolyHannah that P's rights are mostly about what's best for their children when that isn't always the case." -- Of course it isn't.
But the grand-parents still are not the "official deciders" of what is best for someone else's children, their grand-children included.
No one has yet to address the core issue here. If the parents have decided that a relationship with one or both sets GP's who has the right/authority to tell the parents they are "wrong"?
When both sides claim the other is the issue, it should then be up to the parents to decide the best interests of their minor children.
It doesn't matter, unless there is actual abuse going on in our family unit whether our 'parents' "agree" with our choices or not. We get to decide if raising our children "their religion" is best for them. It wasn't good for Us so NO, we aren't going to raise our children the same way.
They call that "abuse". We call it, "Making our own adult decisions just like you did."
Because one side made it clear that regardless of how we choose to raise our children they were going to teach them "a proper religion" and those parents were told they would never meet said children then... But We are abusing them and our children by denying contact according to THEM.
Good Morning Saturday 2nd May 2026


