I really don't understand many of the replies here. I haven't posted on this forum before, but I've read many of the posts and comments, and one sentiment that appears to be near-universal is the idea that estrangement is justified when abuse is present. Yet here we have Fenchurch clearly stating that they were abused and neglected not only as a child (even to the extent that as a teen they gained custody of their younger siblings), but also that the abuse continues into adulthood.
Despite the clearly stated abuse, Fenchurch is getting all sorts of comments suggesting that they should not estrange their parents or that no contact isn't warranted. These comments range from insults, calling Fenchurch " judgemental, intolerant, unsympathetic, controlling and patronising" or saying they're a "tad over dramatic" to suggesting things like therapy or low contact methods, despite Fenchurch saying that they've already done all those things without success. Even using strategies like keeping the conversations centered on the parents or leaving when abuse begins has left Fenchurch in tears and needing time to recover between visits. So why so many comments suggesting Fenchurch continue to subject themselves to abuse?
Fenchurch, please to do not feel pressured to maintain contact with your parents. They are doing you continued harm at a time when you really need to look after yourself. And it isn't just about you. I see that you mentioned children--think of the message that you're sending them by continuing to subject yourself (and them?) to the abuse of your parents. Even if it's not intentional, your children will pick up on the notion that it's okay to treat others so unkindly. But it isn't. You deserve better. Please take care of yourself. You do not owe abusers your time or energy, and shame on anyone suggesting otherwise.