Morning everyone.
[flowers[ and a (((hug))) for you Whiff. I hope you're feeling a little better today. We are all here for you and look forward to seeing you when you're ready.
I can understand your sister's train of thought Ladys. Maybe not initiating contact, but waiting for your son to contact you (which he's doing) is the way to go and putting some boundaries in place.
Refusing to listen to his abuse, firstly by telling him he's way out of line and then ending the call or if you're with him, walking away or telling him to leave.
Due to the size of his father's family, our ES's children are missing out on aunts, uncles and cousins. I know some will say that what you've never had, you never miss but that doesn't alter the fact that they've missed out on so much.
You're right agnurse when you say how the actions of someone can be viewed negatively despite the best of intentions, depending on the recipients opinion, which brings us back to what we so often say on these threads, that you're damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Had Ladys not sent her d.i.l. flowers, with or without the unordered lilies, no doubt she'd have been accused of not caring. They are sent with the best of intentions and regarded as an act of harassment and because they included lilies, a deliberate attempt to kill the cat!!!
If only (if it's true which I don't think it is) her son had taken a moment to think about the flowers his mother as a cat lover and owner, had had in the house over the years. He'd have concluded that she never had lilies, so why on earth would she send lilies to them
.
You're right of course Allsorts that some couples don't announce the pregnancy until those first 3 months have past, but I don't understand why sometimes it's OK for the expectant mother's mother to know, and not the expectant father's.
We know our son's well enough to know if they're never particularly forthcoming about what's going on with their lives and in that case, maybe wouldn't be surprised that we hadn't been told sooner, although I still find that odd.
But if you have a close relationship with your son where he does talk to you about anything and everything, why wouldn't he tell his mum that he was going to be a dad?
IMO D's confiding in their mother's more than their m's.i.l. is neither here nor there; it's to be expected. It doesn't explain why a son who usually confides in his own mother, doesn't tell her the good news. In that situation I think it's perfectly understandable for his mother to feel deliberately excluded.
If it's expected and accepted that our d.i.l's mother and family come first, why is it wrong for us to wonder why the same doesn't apply to our son's?
Whatever the reasons for taking the decision to estrange, I do think it should be seen as life changing with the distinct possibility of being irreversible.
As you say Ladys the longer the estrangement lasts, the harder it may well be to reconcile and in addition is the broken trust. There are so many incidents where the EAC has lied in an attempt to explain and justify their actions. Then there's the fear that having done this once they may do it again, not to mention the heartbreak, pain and anguish they've caused.