Smileless2012
When a poster states that they don't know why they've been estranged, and are responded too by another poster saying they don't understand how they can't know, or perhaps they've been told but aren't listening etc., they are being made to feel that what they're saying isn't/can't be true; that they are fabricating.
I don't know why it has to be such an either or opposition all the time but I do know that it doesn't help when a poster is asked if it's only the advice and support from EP's that's valid. It isn't helped when EP's who are responding are told that they're in an echo chamber, simply because their own experiences align with the one whose posting.
Both of these comments have been made on this thread and they were made by posters who have themselves, or whose partner has estranged their parents. Perhaps that is the answer to your question VS.
No one has suggested that the OP doesn't spend time reflecting Grams2five. As I posted earlier, I've yet to come across an EP who hasn't done so. That doesn't mean that all do and it doesn't mean that the OP hasn't done so and concluded that her D's suggestion of mental illness has no basis in reality.
We don't know if something has occurred that makes (the OP's D) feel this is the case. You say the fact that something has occurred that makes her daughter feel as she does, but you have no way of knowing if this is a fact, if her D's estrangement has anything at all to do with the OP's behaviour, nor does anyone else here.
The OP has told us that her D's insinuation regarding her's, the OP's mental health has no basis in reality. So here's a radical idea, why don't we respond to what we have been told has happened by EleanorRose instead of what we think may have happened.
You can't address what may or may not be behind your AC's estrangement of you if they refuse to talk about it with you.
You are still missing the point. What’s occurred is that her daughter feels she is mentally ill. If as er says she is not , has no basis in realty etc that doesn’t change that her daughter thinks she is. The think is what’s occurred. So rather than suggest ER dismiss this as she says ts categoriclaly untrue, one should seek to understand WHY her daughter thinks it. Whether she suffers from mental illness at all isn’t the issue. It’s that her daughter thinks she does. Any hope of reconciliation on ERs part should start there. What has led her to these thoughts. Her thoughts are what’s happened. The feelings exist. So instead of brushing it off as categorically untrue , start there if one is truly looking for answers. Op said she doesn’t know why she’s been cut off , but then says her daughter says she’s mentally ill. Sounds like that’s the reason at least in part why . But rather , than pursue what her daughter is feeling she’s dismissing it as “not true”. The thing with feelings is they aren’t true or untrue.