sazz1
I fell running to school in the snow. Limped home as my ankle was swelling. Told to put it up with a cold compress on
Next day sent to school still limping. Years later after an x-ray when I fell down the stairs I was told I had 3 historic breaks in that ankle. Just the way it was years ago.
Don't interfere with your son's methods of dealing with things.
I think this is very common.....
My eldest son walked around on a broken ankle (football injury) for a couple of days. He was in his 20s at the time, living away from home, so his responsibility to get proper treatment, not mine. He has a high pain threshold and it simply hadn't occurred to him he had broken the ankle.
I only discovered I'd broken a toe when I went for a routine chiropodist appt. I too have a high pain threshold, stubbed my toe on a coffee table leg and just assumed it was bruised.
We have 27 hand and wrist bones, and 26 foot and ankle bones. Many of them are very small obviously and can be broken very easily. It can be very hard to detect if they are broken or fractured, so for that reason continued pain in the feet, ankles, hands and wrists shouldn't really be ignored. If it doesn't settle after a few days it really needs investigation.
Going back to the original post. It is very common for people to extend their arms when falling to try and break the fall. It is an automatic reflex action.
(Stunt men don't do this, they are trained to do a controlled roll into the fall, so as not to risk broken arms and legs).
Problem with extending the arm to brace against the impact of a fall is that the hand and wrist then take the full brunt and that's when hand and wrist bones get broken, fractured or at best, badly bruised. .
Not saying the Ops GS has broken his wrist but if he did put his arm out and land on his hand, the impact of the fall to his wrist would have been quite considerable. At best it would have been very sore, probably for several days, so not surprising he didnt want to risk further injury playing rugby the next day.
I think both the father and the grandson acted sensibly, both in the immediate DIY first aid treatment and in the aftercare next day. I don't they should be accused of over reacting or that the boy was being mollycoddled. I think the father was just doing right by his son, a bit of basic first aid and pain relief, followed by a bit of judicious caution next day.
It isn't really for anyone else to judge someone else's ability to tolerate pain levels because we all cope with pain differently. . We all have different tolerance levels. Some people can be floored with pain that another person would hardly notice.
I know my two sons are like this......one hardly feels pain, the other doesn't cope very well at all. Nothing to do with how they were brought up. It seems to be genetic, at least it's something I have noticed in our family.
My mother couldn't tolerate pain, my father had a very high pain threshold, nothing seemed to affect him. . I seem to have inherited my fathers high pain threshold as did my eldest son, my youngest son inherited his grandmothers low pain threshold.
It's a balancing act. We don't want to mollycoddle our children and turn them into wimps, totally risk averse and too scared to live and but at the same time we don't want them to suffer unnecessarily or risk long term complications because we didn't perform triage.
To accuse someone of being a wimp because they have a low pain threshold strikes me as being unnecessarily cruel.
I think it's grossly unfair that there are those who lump all our young people together as snowflakes and wimps. Some of our youngsters are stronger than others, both mentally and physically, the same as their parents and grandparents.
And thank goodness mental health issues are no longer a taboo subject.