Doodledog
When my children were little ,we always had to go to my parents' house (also about 25 miles away) to see them. They were in their 50s, had retired and had a car, whereas we both worked full time as well as being very busy because we were working parents. My father died when my son was 2 and my daughter a baby, but this continued (us having to visit my mother) until they left home. I pointed out that the road runs both ways for the same number of miles, but to no avail. I don't drive, and my husband worked shifts, so it wouldn't have been easy for me to visit even if I wasn't working. It would have been nice if my mum had visited even occasionally. She could have picked the children up from school and taken them somewhere just the three of them, or timed it so that she arrived when I got in if she'd rather, but she never did so.
I don't have grandchildren (yet, I hope) but my children both live over 100 miles away in different cities. When/if they have children of their own I would still expect it to be us who visited them as long as my husband is able to drive, and if/when he can't, arrangements would be renegotiated depending on everyone's circumstances at the time. We are relatively busy, but not as much as a working family with children.
Hi, this is exactly what we did with my in-laws (my own parents lived abroad). Your exact situation. This makes me wonder, why does it always have to be all or nothing, a giver and a taker, why cannot people meet others half way, or even 30% of the way, ever? This is what really bugs me. We've been driving to my son's back and forth for the last almost 6 month. Would it be too much to take his super comfortable car with gas paid for by the company to come here once?