Gransnet forums

Health

Britain's Worsening Childhood Mortality

(8 Posts)
HollyDaze Fri 13-Jun-14 09:43:44

More evidence has emerged of the UK falling behind other Western countries over its record on childhood deaths.

The new findings show that since 1970, child and youth death rates in the UK have fallen significantly more slowly in the UK than in 17 other nations in the European Union, Australia, Canada and Norway (EU15+).

Although young people aged 10 to 24 had an average likelihood of death comparable with that of the other countries, this masked poor progress in tackling deaths from non-communicable diseases (NCDs).

Britain's record for infants younger than a year old, and children aged one to nine was said to be especially poor. By 2008, an estimated 1,035 more infant deaths occurred each year in the UK than in the group of nations as a whole.

Worsening NCD trends had cancelled out the benefits of the UK's good record for injury-related deaths, the researchers said.

Lead researcher Professor Russell Viner, from University College London's Institute of Child Health, said: "Fewer children survive and thrive in countries with wide inequalities, such as the UK.

"We urgently need to understand more about the role that is played in causing the mortality excess by social factors, such as higher inequality in Britain than most of Europe, and by differences in our healthcare system to that in many European countries."

NCDs were responsible for around three-quarters of UK deaths of children aged one to nine, and half of all deaths of young people aged 10 to 24.

The study was reported in The Lancet medical journal, which a week ago published other findings showing that children were more likely to die by the age of five in the UK than anywhere else in western Europe except Malta.

Britain's under-five mortality rate was 4.9 deaths per 1,000 births, more than double that of Iceland.

I find this appalling and is certainly at odds with how politicians and the media portray Britain's ability to care for it's citizens.

It will be interesting to see whether or not this receives the same amount of media coverage for action to be taken as overseas needs receive in the news.

Health Minister Dr Dan Poulter said '[blah blah blah] but more needs to be done' - I think if I hear one more politician say that about serious failings in Britain, I shall probably scream. Politicians: stop saying 'more needs to be done' and get on and do it.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/concern-over-uk-child-death-rates-230355396.html#5W495uE

Eloethan Fri 13-Jun-14 11:38:58

I agree that these are shocking statistics, but are you suggesting that this is partly down to spending on overseas aid?

Nelliemoser Fri 13-Jun-14 12:27:07

What would be helpful here is more detailed information about the facts behind the figures.

Which groups of children are dying as a result of what health issues?

What are the age groups involved?

Is it premature babies where Doctors are trying to push back the boundaries for trying to save children at an age at which a premature birth would have been just been considered a miscarriage.

Poorer maternal health? More older Mother's?

I certainly hope there is a great deal more information etc. in the Lancet article.

I really hate these tantalising headlines that do not go on to offer any clarifications at all.

HollyDaze Fri 13-Jun-14 12:46:14

Eloethan - not at all, I'm not sure why you would have thought that to be honest.

My comment was about how much attention will be given to this appalling statistic and if action will be taken as quickly as happens with giving overseas aid.

HollyDaze Fri 13-Jun-14 12:55:35

Nelliemoser

I'm not a member of The Lancet so I can't access the full report. There is a summary of on this link www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2960485-2/fulltext but even the text on that page is copyrighted so I shall play safe and just give the link.

From what I've read, they have compared like with like (including Australia, Canada, Norway) and it seems that our children are not faring as well. Inequality within the country seems to be the thing they are referring to the most.

Joelsnan Fri 13-Jun-14 14:25:44

It would be interesting to see the social and ethnic demographics of these figures. Consanguinity and poor maternal nutrition in some communities has lead to increases in perinatal mortality. It is interesting to note that these figures have been rising along with the rise in certain communities.

Nelliemoser Fri 13-Jun-14 14:42:34

As the original article just states the bald facts and as far as we know, offers no suggestions or hypotheses as to the possible causes of the changes in this mortality rate, it is quite pointless to comment on the figures or suggest any reasons at all.

Which was the point in my original post.

Any speculation on here will be purely guess work, and runs the risk of wrongly apportioning "blame" to a particular demographic group in a manner that is totally unjustified.

Nelliemoser Fri 13-Jun-14 14:55:09

The UK ONS figures can shed a lot more light on this.

Older mothers, (over 40 being one of them.)

ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/mortality-statistics--deaths-registered-in-england-and-wales--series-dr-/2012/sty-causes-of-death.html

www.theguardian.com/society/2014/may/02/uk-child-death-rate-western-europe-health

"Experts said poverty and deprivation in the UK, together with cuts in welfare, were directly linked to the deaths of the youngest children. Babies who die under age of one tend to be from deprived households, have a low birthweight and have parents who smoked. Between ages of one and five, deaths are mostly linked to injuries, accidents and serious diseases such as cancer."