I don't have macular pucker but was diagnosed with a macular hole by an eye hospital's A and E department(my GP thought it could be a detached retina - from our telephone consultation - hence the urgency etc.) six weeks ago. I am adding this in case anyone has a similar problem or macular pucker is time relevant.
I was given an appointment for a further consultation in October.
Once home, reading up on macular holes, I saw that 'time is of the essence' i.e. the sooner the operation is done, the better the outcome - and vice versa....
I rang the hospital and queried if it really was OK to wait some three and a half months before seeing someone. The nurse took advice and later rang to say I was fine to wait and I was initially happy with this.
However, I began to have a zillion questions and decided to have a private consultation. Tested again, I was found to have a 75% increase in the size of my hole in only five weeks. This could have an impact on my future central vision.
The consultant said he would operate a day or so later to stop the rot.
What would have happened had I waited for the NHS consultation in October with a probably a further wait for an operation some months after that?
All a bit worrying.
Do please check that anything to do with your eyes is not time relevant and be pushy if it is!