Statins and resultant skin problems

These statins are always in the headlines yes no yes no...I was told I had to take them 20 years ago, I tried but like others had side effects, then I was told that I didn't really needed them, so stopped them, recently a new GP suggested I started taking them because of my age ( 70). I haven't started taking them after reading that they don't help at our age.

Statins not stations. Bloomin phone.

I stopped taking stations. I had awful rashes, my arm felt numb. I carried on with them but it was the nosebleeds that clinched it for me. I had never had a nosebleed in my life and started having bad ones. The leaflet with my stations had nosebleeds as a main side effect. I was afraid to go out. I was only on a low dose so I'm not sure it was helping my cholesterol much.

Interesting. I've taken statins for 12/13 years now and over the years have noticed certain " eruptions " cropping up. My scalp appears to be very " pimply " like small sweat glands which fill up. I'm fearful of going to any hairdresser in case they think I have mange.
Then there is the rodent ulcer which was removed not many years ago and which has returned------which calls for another appointment.
Also whatever is on my leg has scabbed over but I'm always wary of a long bleed ( warfarin ) should the scab come off.

My stuffing's coming out----hahahaha. Joking apart I've never had spots in my head though and given that statins don't have such a good name it's got me thinking though if they've been proven to prevent heart attacks/strokes ( though I've had a TIA at some point ) then I'll stick with the pimples and eruptions.

After a general checkup, I was referred to my Doctor as according to Nice guidelines my cholesterol was too high.
Thank goodness my Doctor advised me that taking Statins was not advisable or indeed any use, in his opinion, unless you had previously had a heart attack or stroke.
He told me that, of course the choice was mine and if I still wanted them, I could have them but I prefer to listen to my Doctor so chose not to do.

I have recently joined Gransnet and found this thread which interests me. For almost a year I have been suffering with eczema/dermatitis on my hands, around my nails, it then moved onto my back in two places and about 5 months ago to my face. Numerous visits to GP's (not just one) all insisted keep using steroid cream intermittently and emollient. By February it was really bad so I was referred to a dermatologist...4 weeks ago so fed up waiting for an appointment on NHS we paid for a Private Dermatogists. By now I suspected Statins. I paid for biopsies, one on finger, one on my back. Its now come back suggesting, only suggesting its Dermatomyostis. The dermatologist painted a very bleak picture of the likely outcome saying it was not a nice disease. Two questions, anyone had any dealing with this disease? I took myself off statins (simvastatin) 10 days ago and the recovery of my skin is amazing. I still have patches but so much better. Now my GP has to put me through goodness knows how many tests for cancer and other related complications of Dermatomyostis as this skin complaint is usually the marker for other problems. I am concerned as it is a very rare disease, apparently my GP has never seen a case in 31 years of practice. My GP is not ruling out that its an allergic reaction to Simvastatin, and has written on my medical notes that I never am prescribed Statins again.

It stands for a Latin phrase which basically means 'so that proves it'. Sorry if it makes me sound a bit over-educated, I probably am

MrsJamJam - thank you for this info. (What does QED mean?)

Ten years ago I had the same skin problems that came on slowly over a year on stations. GP absolutely adamant that it could not be the station but I still stopped taking them and the skin problems cleared up. QED.

I did then take a lot of care with diet to try anything that might lower cholesterol. Now just hope for the best as I feel fit and healthy.

Iam64 and Willow10 - thank you for the interesting information you passed on. Yes, I looked up the previous threads but found nothing about skin problems.

Am off to my doctor tomorrow but stopped the statin last night. I didn't realise that this could also have been the cause of my bad dreams!

An American doctor Duane Graveline had started investigating this (see spacedoc.com: Skin rashes and Statins) and I was thinking of contacting him. Unfortunately he died two years ago!

I am beginning to think now that it was the statin that actually caused the granuloma over my bunion scar: Gravely writes about "diminished skin wall integrity or reduction in skin cell energy".

..."scratching for England..." Ha Ha Ha! I like that!

I was given statins when my cholesterol was slightly raised. I stopped when I developed an itchy skin rash and it cleared up straight away. I started to use the cholestrrol lowering spreads and drinks instead, which worked really well. I think statins are helpful in certain circumstances but are prescribed too routinely, when moderate diet changes could be advised first.

guilia, there are a couple of threads on statins, it's worth you finding them if you haven't already.
I stopped taking statins a few months ago after developing muscle pain and feeling generally well under par. I feel much better now. The vivid dreams that accompany statins were affecting the quality of my sleep, I now realise, so that's one positive effect of stopping them. The muscle pain gradually diminished.
It hadn't occurred to me till I read your post that the excema/other skin problems that I experienced were down to statins. I'd never had itchy skin but was itching for England. I developed excess on my eye lids, brows along with swollen droopy eye lids. Anti biotic cream sorted that but it recurred until a couple of months ago. since stopping the statins I have no skin problems.
Incidentally, a cardiologist told me there is no evidence to support giving statins to women of our generation because of atrial fibrillation/high cholesterol. He said he'd only prescribe them if there were other significant factors, such as the individual had already suffered a stroke or heart attack.
I suspect we're going to hear much more about the costs and benefits despite the Nice guidelines basically saying most of us should be taking them.
I hope you can resolve your health issues.

Wow you poor thing I really hope they find a solution to your problems.