I think that for some time there will be a gap consisting of women who thought that they were going to retire at 60 and geared up for that, only to find that retirement age is now 67.
It's not just the pension that this group miss out on - it is free admission to 'things', bus passes, discounts and all sorts of other things that our contributions paid for for the generations ahead of us.
Whether or not you (generic) believe that these concessions should have been there in the first place, or whether you as an individual were aware of the change in pension age, and were in a position to plug the gap of 6-7 years of pension, there are a lot of people who weren't, and who were expecting to get them at 60.
There are also people who retired at an age which is now considered 'early', having budgeted around what they expected to have to pay for before deciding to retire. To take away concessions such as free prescriptions could have a life-changing impact on such people.
Also, there is no obvious reason why some conditions allow sufferers to claim all prescriptions free, whether or not the treatment is related to that condition, whilst sufferers from other, equally life-threatening conditions do not get any of them free. People with a thyroid condition, for instance, or diabetes, get free prescriptions for all ailments, whereas people with asthma do not. Inhalers are expensive, and without them asthmatics could die.
The reason over-60s currently don't pay for prescriptions is probably a throwback to when it was the retirement age for women, and because at that age wear and tear on the body starts to kick in. I assume that if this gets means-tested, it will be those on pension credit who qualify, so those above that threshold because they have saved into an occupational pension will miss out yet again.
kittylesater what do you have against pensioners being 'comfortably off' if they have worked all their lives? Isn't being comfortable what we all aim for, and why we save? Younger people are, on the whole, still earning, and saving for their own older age. Those who are old now were young once, and have contributed already. To be 'really pleased' that older people in need of prescriptions will lose out seems not just unkind, but perverse.