Gransnet forums

Health

Data about Pfizer vaccine heavily redacted?

(17 Posts)
Shinamae Thu 10-Mar-22 09:59:34

I’ve just read this on a thread and would like some enlightenment please on what it actually means as I have heard nothing about this…..

maddyone Thu 10-Mar-22 10:03:52

Can’t help, but will follow the thread as I’m interested as all three of my vaccines were Pfizer.

Sparklefizz Thu 10-Mar-22 10:09:23

All 3 of mine were Pfizer too, so following this thread.

volver Thu 10-Mar-22 10:10:43

Shinamae

I’ve just read this on a thread and would like some enlightenment please on what it actually means as I have heard nothing about this…..

Links?

volver Thu 10-Mar-22 10:11:59

Oh wait - is it Dr Campbell?

NotSpaghetti Thu 10-Mar-22 10:13:22

It's not the data about the vaccine as I read. It's about the contracts I think you'll find.

maddyone Thu 10-Mar-22 10:14:52

volver

Oh wait - is it Dr Campbell?

Oh no!

NotSpaghetti Thu 10-Mar-22 10:15:18

Oh, just wondering if you are thinking about the FOI requests in America?

Shinamae Thu 10-Mar-22 10:20:48

volver

Shinamae

I’ve just read this on a thread and would like some enlightenment please on what it actually means as I have heard nothing about this…..

Links?

I think I explained I had read it on another thread and would like some enlightenment because I have no clue about this..links or otherwise

volver Thu 10-Mar-22 10:22:54

You could link to the thread...

I tried searching online and couldn't find anything. Just the Mumsnet thread about Campbell.

Blossoming Thu 10-Mar-22 10:23:40

Which other thread OP? Your post is the only mention I’ve seen of it.

volver Thu 10-Mar-22 10:25:19

I'm not being argumentative Shinamae, just looking for more to go on.

Shinamae Thu 10-Mar-22 10:26:33

Good lord, it was on “does anyone think Putin‘s war will spread”, it is the last paragraph and it is a sentence in that, that I picked up on..

Shinamae Thu 10-Mar-22 10:30:50

I should probably have said the last posting on that thread at the time,I don’t think I should mention the posters name I don’t think gransnet like that ?

volver Thu 10-Mar-22 10:31:15

OK thanks Shinamae. I'll have a look and so will others, I'm sure.

Shinamae Thu 10-Mar-22 10:34:37

volver

OK thanks Shinamae. I'll have a look and so will others, I'm sure.

You’re welcome, hope I haven’t stirred up a hornets nest with this ??‍♀️

OakDryad Thu 10-Mar-22 10:47:01

To put this into context …

Presumably this is to do with the the US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) asking for 55 years to produce information requested under a Freedom of Information Application (FOIA) because it requires the review of some 329,000 pages of documentation.

The news report I read first is dated 18 November 2021 released via Reuters.

www.reuters.com/legal/government/wait-what-fda-wants-55-years-process-foia-request-over-vaccine-data-2021-11-18/

The plaintiffs, a group of more than 30 professors and scientists from universities including Yale, Harvard, UCLA and Brown filed suit in September 2021 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, seeking expedited access to the records. They say that releasing the information could help reassure vaccine skeptics that the shot is indeed “safe and effective and, thus, increase confidence in the Pfizer vaccine.”

But the FDA can’t simply turn the documents over wholesale. The records must be reviewed to redact “confidential business and trade secret information of Pfizer or BioNTech and personal privacy information of patients who participated in clinical trials,” wrote Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers in a joint status report filed Monday.

The FDA proposes releasing 500 pages per month on a rolling basis, noting that the branch that would handle the review has only 10 employees and is currently processing about 400 other FOIA requests.


Plaintiffs' lawyers argue that their request should be top priority, and that the FDA should release all the material no later than March 3, 2022.

Then this dated 7 March 2022:

www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/97544

The FDA have now begun to turn over the documents, releasing 55,000 earlier this month.

The nonprofit that won the case, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, sued the FDA last September, claiming that the agency denied its request to expedite the release of COVID-19 vaccine review documents via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In a November joint status report, the FDA proposed releasing around 500 pages of the documents each month -- which would fulfill the organization's FOIA request in about 55 to 75 years.

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency includes several physicians known for spreading false or misleading information during the pandemic, including Aaron Kheriaty, MD, Harvey Risch, MD, PhD, and Peter McCullough, MD.