I think it best to leave Jewish people out of it, or indeed any other group other than the trans lobby.
British Media. Let’s have a change please!
Expensive free range chicken was tasteless!
Princess Grace hospital cancelled vital surgery for a woman who requested female-only staff and would not accept a transwoman nurse as female.
After many, many complaints from individuals HCA Healthcare UK (owner of Princess Grace Hospital) has now offered the surgery involving female-only staff, at its Wellington Hospital in London on October 31 .
mobile.twitter.com/ripx4nutmeg/status/1587082103086276609
I think it best to leave Jewish people out of it, or indeed any other group other than the trans lobby.
FleurPepper
I have Jewish friends too they would never deny that they are Jewish. So I don’t understand the point you are making.
What is your point Fleurpepper?
All of those people are still Jewish, whether they agree with the Israeli government or not.
Would any of them deny that they are?
''The difference is thaat Jewish people (or any other of the less contentious groups who have been hastily dragged in to make the first attempt seem less offensive) are not asking for a shift in people's perceptions so that they can claim to be something they aren't.'' it depends when and where''. I have Jewish friends who have moved away from Israel, as they just cannot be or be part of, in any way, shape or form, what Jews are doing to Palestinians right now and for a very long time. And using their faith to do so. Fact.
It’s blatant discrimination against females when TW do those things mentioned by Doodledog above and evidenced by many such activities.
But who is to blame for damaging the image of transpeople who do none of those things?
Is it the trans who do those discriminatory acts, and the raucous support they are given for doing that?
I hope no one would say the blame lies with the females who object to TW cheating, or object to TW accessing female safe spaces and facilities or TW presenting themselves as ‘women’ when a female has been requested.
But I’m afraid that some posters might.
This thread has taken a sinister turn
And if it gets reported, it wasn't me
Laters
It's still discrimination though
VioletSky
volver
No one can say that some transpeople/jewish/ginger haired people behave badly and that spoils it for all the transpeople/jews/ginger haired people.
It is blaming people who can be described by a particular adjective for the bad behaviour of other people who can be described with the same adjective. That, by definition, is discrimination.Yes it is
The difference is thaat Jewish people (or any other of the less contentious groups who have been hastily dragged in to make the first attempt seem less offensive) are not asking for a shift in people's perceptions so that they can claim to be something they aren't.
They exist as they are, and if there are those who have issues with their existence the problem lies with them. TRAs/Transallies are asking others to believe that changing sex is possible, and to have special dispensation to do things that other people don't. They are asking to be given the right to enter lucrative sports contests with massive advantage, to enter spaces previously reserved for the opposite sex, to have the language adapted to protect their sensibilities and push out those of women, and so on. They also claim to be 'the most marginalised group' in society, when this is not borne out by the evidence at all.
They have no mandate for this from transpeople who just want to live as transpeople, and not live a lie, but surely it is not surprising that those being asked to make all the concessions above might assume that the demands are coming from all transpeople - these things can't be considered on a case by case basis after all. It is not 'discrimination' to point that out, whichever way you look at it.
Blaming all women for the shamefull behaviour of a few would be discrimination.
Especially when the few know exactly what they are doing and don't care who gets hurt
volver
No one can say that some transpeople/jewish/ginger haired people behave badly and that spoils it for all the transpeople/jews/ginger haired people.
It is blaming people who can be described by a particular adjective for the bad behaviour of other people who can be described with the same adjective. That, by definition, is discrimination.
Yes it is
Jane71
It is volver who is saying that people are saying she is racist, not posters themselves. It is ironic that, as someone claiming to be concerned about media manipulation, she is clearly making an attempt at using such techniques herself.
And for the record, none of the above is suggesting that volver is racist, as I am 100% certain that she is aware.
It is suggesting that she used very dubious and lazy sophistry to try to score points, and the pretence that pointing this out is accusing her of racism is further evidence of her desperation to 'win' this debate.
It will never be won by either side. Transwomen are not women, and no amount of rhetoric will change that. But more importantly, it is not a game, so can't be won or lost. Women's rights are at stake, and innocent transpeople are being caught in the crossfire.
*volver
I am seriously offended by people who think I'm racist, even subconsciously racist.
Right now, this forum's not for me. Few days off I think.*
I'm sorry you feel like this volver, as I've always enjoyed reading your posts. I don't understand why people think you're a racist, and I can appreciate you being upset by the thought. It's sometimes difficult to discuss issues without other posters going off on one.
Please come back.
I still don’t feel easy about where that came from.
Nor do I, Lathyrus. It's a non-sequitur for a start, is dangerously close to Godwin's Law, and is using centuries of anti-semitism and actual discrimination very distastefully to try to score points in an argument.
Firstly, there is no correlation between anti-semitism and concern about women's rights being eroded, and our very existence as a sex-class being called into question. None at all.
Secondly, however dubious, an attempt to link such concerns to anti-semitism is, insofar as the analogy holds, suggesting that those who hold them are transphobic, and by extension have murderous intent towards transpeople, which is not only ridiculous but offensive.
Thirdly, questioning the biologically impossible assertion that TWAW is not transphobia in any case.
You didn’t make it clear in your post that you were referencing one comment by another poster.
It was the post right above mine. I expected people would work that out.
Jewish. Black. Scottish. Brown eyed. Choose what you prefer.
I am seriously offended by people who think I'm racist, even subconsciously racist.
Right now, this forum's not for me. Few days off I think.
volver
Replace the word "trans" with "Jewish."
Still feeling you have a supportable position?
You didn’t make it clear in your post that you were referencing one comment by another poster.
I wonder why you chose Jewish?
I still don’t feel easy about where that came from.
VioletSky
Doodledog
Someone without true gender dysphoria abusing the rights of others to attack women is just a male predator so yes it does matter. An offender will still offend by other means if that is their goal.
But someone with true gender dysphoria abusing the rights of others to attack women is A ok?
This makes absolutely no sense. I have sympathy with people who have gender dysphoria, but hadn't really considered that people might fake it. I suppose people do what people can do, but that's a new one on me.
Anyway, if memory serves, the question about genuine GD was asked with reference to the law, and the fact remains that laws are about actions, not 'feelings'. There can't be two people charged with the same offence and treated differently because one says he has feelings that differ from the other's, so whether GD is real or faked is irrelevant, really - it is not a defence in law.Doodledog I didn't get past your second paragraph because frankly it's disgusting
I absolutely know you don't think I think that and I know you know I am a survivor and my hatred for abuse of women and children as we have discussed it on different threads.
I feel tainted and dirty after the last few comments so thank you for that guys.
Self reflection and personal growth is a wonderful thing
Sleep well
Of course I don't believe it, and as you said, you know that.
It was a question (hence the question mark) as it is the obvious extension of your comments calling into question the credibility of people's claims to have dysphoria. You also said yourself that anyone without true GD is just another attacker.
I haven't brought up the idea that people might fake it - as I said, I hadn't even considered the possibility until you mentioned it, and still think it's a stretch.
Maybe if you stop reading when you come across an idea you don't agree with, even when it is one you indirectly expressed yourself, that explains why there are so many misunderstandings in your posts.
I used to read Indias Twitter as I like to read a range of views on this issue, trying to avoid the confirmation bubbles, but the well racism and misogyny just became impossible to me.
That biological men aren't women, and can't change sex is just too complex for their addled brains.
People such as India Willoughby are acting from an initial position of "I Want!!!".
They then come up with ever more ridiculous attempts to justify their Want .
As long as women are willing to speak out on this matter then politicians will have to listen, we make up a lot of the electorate.
Rosie51
Trans icons such as India Willoughby repeatedly claim that if black women are women, then so are transwomen. No amount of telling them that of course black women, brown women, olive skinned women, white women, women of any faith or none and transmen are all women because we share a biological sex seems to penetrate their thick skull, or their racism. That biological men aren't women, and can't change sex is just too complex for their addled brains.
Rosie51 Trans icon! Seems addled indeed.
Mostly though, they know what they are saying is wrong, but do not care as long as it advances their cause.
petra
Doesn't it get lonely on that haughty pedestal of yours Volver
Not when the people at the bottom of the pedestal get their pitchforks out.
I will explain this as straightforwardly as I can.
It was posted that the actions of some trans people are spoiling it for other trans people. I didn't post that.
To try to help explain how inappropriate that is, I drew the comparison with Jewish people. Would we let it go uncommented on if someone said that the action of some Jews spoil it for all the Jews? Of course not. Many of you would speak out about such a comment.
But for some unfathomable reason, some of you are jumping to the conclusion that I think trans people are like Jews, and that some posters on here are racist. Look into your own motives, folks. Try to understand what was said, instead of assuming somebody you are not keen on is a racist.
Trans icons such as India Willoughby repeatedly claim that if black women are women, then so are transwomen. No amount of telling them that of course black women, brown women, olive skinned women, white women, women of any faith or none and transmen are all women because we share a biological sex seems to penetrate their thick skull, or their racism. That biological men aren't women, and can't change sex is just too complex for their addled brains.
Doesn't it get lonely on that haughty pedestal of yours Volver
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.