Gransnet forums

Health

High cholesterol/high blood pressure

(114 Posts)
CariadAgain Tue 08-Apr-25 15:27:39

I thought I'd got my high blood pressure I've been told about in recent years (where it's supposed to be/used to be a little on the low side) was sorted now.

Went off for a referral to cardiology department today. Three perfectly pleasant people checking me out and proceeding to look very worried...mutter about "statins", "statins", "statins......risk of strokes.

Not so bothered about possible heart attacks in the event (something that is hugely prevalent both sides of my family) but they keep going "risk of stroke......risk of stroke.....statins....statins....statins".

I do NOT want to be stuck on a "take drugs....medical drugs...permanently treadmill". I'm very proud of the fact I look after my health pretty well and I don't take any regular medication....as in "Go me...the gal done good that I'm not in that position".

When they say "heart attack threatening" I don't find that a particularly big deal. There's LOADS of heart attacks in my family and I just think "Oh well I live on my own - so there shouldnt be anyone trying to Be A Hero and revive me = not a problem then unless I'm out and near a would-be well-meaning hero. But I do get worried when they say "Stroke risk....stroke risk" and my best friend (now I'm living miles away from her) and she had two minor strokes from same thing - and got "brought back" by modern medicine. I've known her for many years - and it wouldnt be apparent to a stranger that she isnt as she was. But I've known her so many years that I know her feet are problematic after that and I know her mind got affected and doesn't think as well as it used to do.

I do "natural" remedies - take them for a while and they, hopefully, solve the problem and then I stop taking them and think "Job done...solved". I do NOT do "being on medical drugs for years!!!".

I thought I'd sorted the blood pressure problem, for instance, because I've been getting normal readings when I check on my own monitor recently. I know about "White coat syndrome" but they tell me the high blood pressure is still there - even allowing for that and the look on their faces was a picture - ie it's sky-high!!!!!!

I do not want to take drugs regularly. I do not want a stroke - obviously. I've been sent out with instructions at taking my own blood pressure at the same time per day every day for 7 days - so it's not affected for the better by me being in a "calm mode" - and it just gets what it gets at the same time per day - and so might include times when someone has just upset me. I am honestly not bothered in the slightest if my body goes and dies on me....I'd see the plus side of that and be there in Heaven sipping my glass of virtual champagne and celebrating being free of a physical body.

Now what? I have read about statins - eek! eek! eek! That's a no then. Including seeing side -effects can last permanently after that from them if one consequently stops taking them. So - "What's the point of taking Drug A - if it's going to make me ill with something else". "What's the point of taking Drug B if I'm supposed to stay on it for life? - drugs are to cure the problem and end of and not be a permanent fixture". The drug companies profits can come from someone else and I'm not going to be a regular source of income for them - I only take them occasionally for a short time until problem resolved!

Personally - I take whatever-it-is until Job Done time and then I stop. I do NOT take drugs permanently - never have/never will.

Now what? Who else has been put in a similar situation - and what way did you deal with it "once and for all...= end of". Then they get on with their lives....

NotSpaghetti Thu 17-Apr-25 07:42:34

The trouble is, foxie, each time someone decides not to take advice they still need that advice to work out if they want to follow it.

The idea that people who often don't take advice shouldn't seek it in the first place is just silly.

We all like to know what a doctor/consultant thinks so that we are able to make a decision!

foxie48 Wed 16-Apr-25 18:47:06

What I don't understand is this continual claim that doctors get paid for prescribing statins and blood pressure tablets. They most certainly don't in the UK, they get paid for doing health checks and if someone chooses not to take their GP's advice fgs stop having the health checks and stop wasting your GP's time. My daughter is a doctor and the suggestion that she is motivated by anything other than wanting the best outcome for her patients is, frankly, just so insulting!

CariadAgain Wed 16-Apr-25 18:22:39

I thought things had moved onto a grown-up debate/logical thinking now.

Obviously not...clearly some still getting a kick out of putting down other people....

Jaxjacky Wed 16-Apr-25 17:03:21

You make me laugh Cariad

Aveline Wed 16-Apr-25 16:58:23

Logically option 2 could cost the NHS a fortune. If you collapse in the street with your major heart attack or stroke you will be rushed to hospital and treated. There won't be time for you to say, 'Actually, leave me alone.' You might wake up in ICU unable to speak or voice your preferences. Services are busy and under pressure. They'll actually first.

CariadAgain Wed 16-Apr-25 16:11:50

Whilst facts are being quoted - one way or another - to prove or disprove a verdict = it would be useful to have the facts of the basic two approaches to the news one has started down the heart failure route:

1. THE CONVENTIONAL APPROACH
Do what you're told by the medics - and have the various tests and then charge the NHS for packet after packet of statins and any other conventional drugs they prescribe. Plus any drugs they prescribe for side-effects. Plus operation after operation after operation (I didn't know my brother very well - but, from what I was told, that would be stent operation, after stent operation, after bypass operation and don't forget the kidneys started to play up during this and hence more "treatment")

VERSUS
Finding out enough to have a good idea what's what for oneself and to make one's own decisions and then the ill person paying for themselves for books about it all, paying for themselves for whatever treatment they've decided for themselves, paying the extra costs involved in eating a healthier diet, etc, etc.

Logically, approach 2 costs the NHS a lot less - and costs the person themselves a lot more.

Food for thought! It would be rather nice for those of us taking the 2nd approach to have at least some help towards the costs of the "alternative" approach and the NHS would still be quids-in compared to someone taking the 1st approach and our own finances wouldn't take such a knock from having taken that approach.

NotSpaghetti Tue 15-Apr-25 23:16:24

Growing0ldDisgracefully

I was watching an alarming programme yesterday (can't remember which channel unfortunately) which was saying there is a strong g link between taking statins and increased incidence of dementia!

Does anyone have a link to this.

A quick look at the research seems to be at odds with this info.

A recent (2025) meta analysis finds differently
Statin use and dementia risk: A systematic review and updated meta‐analysis

This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that statin use is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of dementia, including AD and VaD. Our study, encompassing over 7 million patients across 55 observational studies, provides robust evidence supporting the neuroprotective potential of statins.

alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/VH2DIBPXY9ME8WZUBMNM?target=10.1002/trc2.70039

janeainsworth Tue 15-Apr-25 18:55:47

Growingold
A link doesn’t mean a cause.
I didn’t see the programme you refer to, or the research the programme makers used as the basis for their argument.
But it could simply mean that more old people take statins. More old people have dementia. It follows that there is an increased incidence of dementia in people stating statins.
It doesn’t mean the statins have caused the dementia.
I think the study that Foxie refers to is far more likely to be a reliable source of information.

foxie48 Tue 15-Apr-25 18:37:58

"A study published in The Lancet Regional Health suggests that statin use is associated with a lower risk of all-cause dementia and its subtypes in patients with heart failure (HF). Specifically, statin users had a 28% lower risk of Alzheimer's disease, a 18% lower risk of vascular dementia, and a 20% lower risk of unspecified dementia. Another study in The Lancet found that individuals 50 years and older prescribed statins had a substantially lower risk of developing dementia, according to The Lancet. "

Growing0ldDisgracefully Tue 15-Apr-25 18:13:21

I was watching an alarming programme yesterday (can't remember which channel unfortunately) which was saying there is a strong g link between taking statins and increased incidence of dementia!

kircubbin2000 Tue 15-Apr-25 12:30:51

Article today claims beetroot supplement and garlic tablets can reduce BP. The last time I took beetroot it upset my tummy.

NotSpaghetti Tue 15-Apr-25 11:09:24

... or go to Google scholar and read the research.

www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.013

This is just one study (2023) (of many) looking at statins/ placebo/ red rice/ plant sterols.
If you read the linked articles you can find more interesting info re red yeasted rice

Comparative Effects of Low-Dose Rosuvastatin, Placebo, and Dietary Supplements on Lipids and Inflammatory Biomarkers

Menopauselbitch Tue 15-Apr-25 09:25:12

Google British Supplements and read the reviews on Plant Steriols. Game changer. Please do not take statins. They have also lowered what’s acceptable, so be wary.

Aldom Mon 14-Apr-25 10:03:53

Undines years ago, a friend listened to advice from someone who shared your thinking.
Instead of seeking the advice of a medical doctor she followed the advice from the*alternative medicine* person. Three weeks later
my friend was dead.
She was thirty three years old.
Her death could have been prevented!

jocork Mon 14-Apr-25 08:16:21

I went onto statins reluctantly having read about some side effects etc. Thankfully I haven't suffered any. I'm also on BP meds and medication for diabetes. Personally I try to take my doctor's advice though I discuss concerns. I read around things and take supplements to try to avoid known side effects. For instance statins can deplete your co-enzyme Q10, which depletes as you age anyway, so I take a supplement.
As others have said, if you won't take your doctor's advice don't waste his or her time!
I have also talked to some knowledgeable people who reassured me about the benefits of statins - friends I studied Biochemistry with at university - and I trust their opinions perhaps more than my GP.

Pinkhousegirl Mon 14-Apr-25 05:52:00

absolutely your choice, and, having lost both parents to a massive heart attack and stroke, it is not a bad way to go if you go. A friend's mum hung on for 12 years, doubly incontinent, in a wheelchair, unable to speak. I come from a long line of heart/stroke victims, it is in my dna, I eat healthily walk and cycle miles but that makes no difference. I have been on statins and bp tabs for years. I am grateful for modern medicine, in so many ways, it has saved my life several times, from dangerous birth of one of my children onwards. But your choice ....

SueDonim Sun 13-Apr-25 22:58:38

What a load of rubbish you’ve spouted, Undines. My medic dd has not been trained by drug companies what a scurrilous and nasty thing to say. angry

icanhandthemback Sun 13-Apr-25 22:45:26

'Safe' BP levels have come down and down over recent decades, to get more people on meds...'

I think the drive has been to save lives rather than to get people on meds. Whilst I wouldn't rule out alternative medications altogether, the practitioners don't practice just out of the goodness of their hearts, they do it to make money. Quite a lot of what they hand out has no proper research to back up the claims made. At least what the medics prescribe has had the research done and peer reviewed.

Aveline Sun 13-Apr-25 21:13:56

Absolute nonsense. Medical students are rigorously trained including in how to interpret good quality research

NotSpaghetti Sun 13-Apr-25 21:10:18

I don't believe GPs are, basically, trained by the drug companies
That is ridiculous.

Please could you evidence this?

Obviously drug companies are at conferences etc but training???

undines Sun 13-Apr-25 20:12:15

Well CariadAgain, I'm with you and at 74 keep well away from doctors and pills while the Great Mother preserves me! Oh yes, the white-coats are for the most part well-meaning, but they are, basically, trained by the drug companies, who fund goodness knows what, including of course most research. Yes of course they are 'expert' in what they've been told, but many of us question if it's the truth, including cardiologist Aseem Malhotra. But still take care of your health. 'Safe' BP levels have come down and down over recent decades, to get more people on meds, and Big Pharma laughing all the way to the bank. But if your BP is high, get it down naturally, there is an Ayurvedic herb, moktavati that can help. Have a very good diet, good supplements, consult alternative practitioners (also very highly trained, by organisations that do not have vested interests) and exercise regularly - you know all the usual advice. Sounds like you know the other bit of good advice - keep smiling!

NotSpaghetti Sun 13-Apr-25 19:25:46

I'm not sure what you're saying, Cumbrian123 - what do you mean please?

Cumbrian123 Sun 13-Apr-25 19:12:17

When your times up, it’s up, delay it with medications if you want, live every day as if it’s your last because one day- you’ll be right. Somethings going to get you.
You can be one of those who shuffles from appointment to appointment, this consultant that consultant unpleasant tests, hospital admissions , keeps everyone ,taxis, charity coffee shops, newspapers, crisps, sweets sugary drinks companies, and drug companies going I suppose.

Gwenisgreat1 Sun 13-Apr-25 19:06:26

I had a TIA in York district hospital, I wouldn't have known but I had my sister, a retired nurse visiting me at the time. The staff in the hospital weren't too bothered, which surprised me. I have to admit I wasn't taking my statins at the time. I do haveHigh cholesterol, but my blood pressure is on the low side of normal. At the moment I am waiting to be seen to decide which statin I should be taking

grammargran Sun 13-Apr-25 18:19:28

I was wondering the same myself 2507CO, Cariad had clearly made up her mind so what was the point unless it was to get all us grans twittering amongst ourselves - and she’s succeeded there! But love her chosen name anyway ….